Should I use Infragistics?
See What's New in Infragistics Ultimate 26.1 - infragistics.com
Depends. Buy if you're an enterprise Microsoft-stack team shipping data-heavy apps and per-dev fees fit budget. Skip it for small teams or simple apps — free open-source UI kits will do.
Confidence
Medium. Based on ~45 public sources; review snippets were truncated, so no verbatim user quotes were available.
Ratings
- Value for moneyReddit debates cost; no rating evidence
- Ease of useNo usability ratings in sources
- Feature depth
- Support qualityPriority support sold; no quality data
- Security posture
Pricing
$1,295/yr
Ignite UI
ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Infragistics UltimateSee pricing page
Best for
- →Enterprise .NET teams
- →Data-heavy dashboards
- →Blazor/Angular line-of-business apps
- →Embedded analytics via Reveal
Not for
- ×Solo devs on free stacks
- ×Startups watching budget
- ×Simple sites or prototypes
- ×Teams avoiding vendor lock-in
Gotchas - check before you buy
medium
Renewal lapse stops updates and support; budget annual renewals into cost
medium
Old CVEs (2010 WebHtmlEditor, 2016 CVE-2016-10552) may linger in deployed legacy apps
low
Third-party Drift widget security notice posted; audit embedded chat scripts on your sites
low
Per-dev annual pricing varies by bundle; confirm current list prices before committing
Pros and cons
Pros
- +Covers Angular, Blazor, React, WinForms, WPF plus BI and design-to-code
- +Reveal named G2 Leader in embedded BI (2022)
- +30+ years in market, bootstrapped without venture capital
- +Enterprise-scale customers including Fujitsu partnership across 162,000 employees
- +Active release cadence — Ultimate 25.1 shipped May 2025
Cons
- −Legacy products carry disclosed vulnerabilities from 2010 and 2016
- −Lapsed subscription cuts off updates and support
- −Developers on Reddit still debate paying for UI libraries
- −Multiple Reddit comparisons pivot to Radzen instead
- −Modest review footprint (138 G2 reviews) for a 30-year vendor
Sources & method
Analyzed 9/26/2026 - 14 sources - No recent breaches found; two old disclosures on record (2010 WebHtmlEditor, 2016 missing-encryption CVE).
official x3review x5security x3news x3
- CVE-2016-10552, Missing encryption of sensitive data in an Infragistics product.
- WebHtmlEditor 7.1 Multiple Vulnerabilities, Disclosed 2010 against the legacy editor control.
Comments
One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.
No comments yet.