shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Infragistics?

See What's New in Infragistics Ultimate 26.1 - infragistics.com

Depends. Buy if you're an enterprise Microsoft-stack team shipping data-heavy apps and per-dev fees fit budget. Skip it for small teams or simple apps — free open-source UI kits will do.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~45 public sources; review snippets were truncated, so no verbatim user quotes were available.

Ratings

  • Value for moneyReddit debates cost; no rating evidence
  • Ease of useNo usability ratings in sources
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityPriority support sold; no quality data
  • Security posture

Pricing

$1,295/yr

Ignite UI

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Infragistics UltimateSee pricing page

Best for

  • Enterprise .NET teams
  • Data-heavy dashboards
  • Blazor/Angular line-of-business apps
  • Embedded analytics via Reveal

Not for

  • Solo devs on free stacks
  • Startups watching budget
  • Simple sites or prototypes
  • Teams avoiding vendor lock-in

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Renewal lapse stops updates and support; budget annual renewals into cost

medium

Old CVEs (2010 WebHtmlEditor, 2016 CVE-2016-10552) may linger in deployed legacy apps

low

Third-party Drift widget security notice posted; audit embedded chat scripts on your sites

low

Per-dev annual pricing varies by bundle; confirm current list prices before committing

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Covers Angular, Blazor, React, WinForms, WPF plus BI and design-to-code
  • Reveal named G2 Leader in embedded BI (2022)
  • 30+ years in market, bootstrapped without venture capital
  • Enterprise-scale customers including Fujitsu partnership across 162,000 employees
  • Active release cadence — Ultimate 25.1 shipped May 2025

Cons

  • Legacy products carry disclosed vulnerabilities from 2010 and 2016
  • Lapsed subscription cuts off updates and support
  • Developers on Reddit still debate paying for UI libraries
  • Multiple Reddit comparisons pivot to Radzen instead
  • Modest review footprint (138 G2 reviews) for a 30-year vendor

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/26/2026 - 14 sources - No recent breaches found; two old disclosures on record (2010 WebHtmlEditor, 2016 missing-encryption CVE).

official x3review x5security x3news x3
  • CVE-2016-10552, Missing encryption of sensitive data in an Infragistics product.
  • WebHtmlEditor 7.1 Multiple Vulnerabilities, Disclosed 2010 against the legacy editor control.

Key stats

  • Feature depth: 4/5

    Rating

  • $1,295/yr

    Starting price

  • 14

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money. Reddit debates cost; no rating evidence
  • Ease of use. No usability ratings in sources
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Multi-framework suite plus BI and design-to-code
  • Support quality. Priority support sold; no quality data
  • Security posture: 3/5. Two old CVEs; active security pages
  • 138 G2 reviews across Infragistics products
  • $1,295/yr Ignite UI price per TrustRadius comparison
  • $50M Innovation fund launched 2021, self-funded
  • 30+ years In market bootstrapped, no VC

Pricing

Ignite UI

$1,295/yr

  • JS, Angular, Blazor, React components
  • High-performance grids and charts

Infragistics Ultimate

See pricing page

  • All platforms incl. WinForms, WPF
  • Adds App Builder and Reveal BI

Security

No recent breaches found; two old disclosures on record (2010 WebHtmlEditor, 2016 missing-encryption CVE).

  • CVE-2016-10552Missing encryption of sensitive data in an Infragistics product.⁶
  • WebHtmlEditor 7.1 Multiple VulnerabilitiesDisclosed 2010 against the legacy editor control.⁷

What users say

G2 and Gartner carry ratings across Infragistics toolkits (138 G2 reviews), while Reddit threads show developers weighing paid suites against free options.

Companies that use it

  • Fujitsu12
  • Keysight Technologies
  • TEG Analytics
  • Penn State
Full analysis

Based on ~45 public sources; review snippets were truncated, so no verbatim user quotes were available.

Enterprise UI component suite that only pays off on data-heavy .NET/Angular apps; overkill for small teams.

Methodology

Based on ~45 public sources; review snippets were truncated, so no verbatim user quotes were available.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. review
  6. security
  7. security
  8. security
  9. official
  10. official
  11. official
  12. news
  13. news
  14. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.