Infragistics
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you're an enterprise Microsoft-stack team shipping data-heavy apps and per-dev fees fit budget.
Comparison
Infragistics and Radzen both land on Depends.
Buy if you're an enterprise Microsoft-stack team shipping data-heavy apps and per-dev fees fit budget.
Blazor-savvy .NET teams get a genuinely good, free component library; pay $799/dev only if the low-code Studio saves you real dev time.
| Compare | Infragistics | Radzen |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Enterprise .NET teams | .NET teams building internal tools |
| Who it's not for | Solo devs on free stacks | tech stacks . Blazor-only, useless elsewhere |
| Privacy | No recent breaches found; two old disclosures on record (2010 WebHtmlEditor, 2016 missing-encryption CVE).⁶ | No breaches found; a disclosed 2025 medium-severity vulnerability plus dependency and CSP warnings, addressed on official forums. |
| Support quality | Priority support sold; no quality data | Active forum; some issue threads linger unresolved |
| Public sentiment | G2 and Gartner carry ratings across Infragistics toolkits (138 G2 reviews), while Reddit threads show developers weighing paid suites against free options.¹ | Developers praise component quality and ship it to production, but a vocal minority calls it over-engineered with recurring issues. |
| Biggest gotcha | Renewal lapse stops updates and support; budget annual renewals into cost10 | Strict Content-Security-Policy breaks DataGrid advanced filtering; may need unsafe directives |