shouldiuse.io

Report

Should I Use Jami?

jami.net·Analyzed 13 hours ago··Based on 12 sources

Jami - the distributed and open source communication platform

Depends

Depends

Great fit for privacy-minded individuals and open-source users who tolerate rough edges.

Free, private, P2P messenger privacy fans want to love — but reliability threads never stop.

Confidence: Medium

$0

Personal price

Free, unlimited messaging and calls

Open source

License

GNU package, peer-to-peer

2 (2023)

CVEs disclosed

Local DoS; medium input-validation flaw

JAMS

Enterprise tier

Via Jami Store; pricing unpublished

Value for money5

Free, open-source, unlimited use

Ease of use2

Reliability complaints dominate user forums

Feature depth3

Calls, chat, sharing, plus enterprise account management

Support quality2

Community forum only; reliability threads unresolved

Security posture3

E2EE and P2P, but two 2023 CVEs

Pros

  • Completely free and open-source; no accounts or subscriptions²
  • End-to-end encrypted and fully peer-to-peer, no central servers
  • Cross-platform: Linux, Windows, macOS, Android, iOS; official GNU package
  • Optional JAMS enterprise server for user and device management³

Cons

  • Reliability doubts recur: 'Has anyone actually got Jami to work reliably?'
  • Fans struggle to convert contacts; small user base
  • Two CVEs disclosed in 2023, including local denial-of-service
  • Windows client problems reported on official forum10

Gotchas

  • mediumEnterprise JAMS pricing not published; requires Jami Store sales contact³
  • mediumCorporate networks must whitelist domains and ports (dhtproxy servers)11
  • mediumFree-tier support is community forum only; reliability threads stay unresolved
  • lowOfficial security page appears missing, limiting published security guidance

Best for

  • Privacy-focused individuals
  • Open-source and GNU advocates
  • Low-infrastructure or offline-first settings
  • Self-hosting experimenters

Not for

  • Businesses needing reliable daily team chat
  • Teams wanting vendor SLAs and support contracts
  • Anyone onboarding non-technical contacts
  • Slack-style workflows with integrations

Pricing

Jami (open source)

$0

  • Unlimited messaging, audio and video calls
  • End-to-end encrypted, peer-to-peer
  • All major platforms

JAMS (enterprise)

Not published

  • User and device management
  • Sold via Jami Store

Security

End-to-end encrypted and peer-to-peer by design; two 2023 CVEs disclosed, trackers list four total.

  • CVE-2023-3433 — Local Denial of ServicePublicly disclosed by Black Lantern Security; local DoS in the Jami application.
  • CVE-2023-3434 — Input validation flaw (CVSS 5.4)Medium-severity flaw allowing an attacker to send crafted input; tracked on NVD.

What users say

Users admire the privacy architecture but repeatedly question whether Jami works reliably for daily use.

I really want to like Jami
Reddit, r/selfhosted
I keep trying to convert
Reddit, r/privacy
I've been trying Jami off and on
Jami Forum

Alternatives

Compare Jami with each alternative.

Signal

Best-known private messenger; far easier to get contacts onto

Jitsi Meet

Open-source video meetings; simpler for scheduled calls

Matrix / Element

Federated encrypted chat with larger ecosystem and bridges

Conversations (XMPP)

Lightweight XMPP messaging; easy self-hosting

Full analysis

Based on ~25 public sources; most snippets truncated, so quotes are partial and sentiment drawn largely from titles.

Sources

  1. official
  2. Jami on Google Playplay.google.com
    official
  3. official
  4. review
  5. review
  6. review
  7. review
  8. security
  9. security
  10. review
  11. official
  12. review

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Ask a follow-up

Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.

    Comments

    One queue. No replies. Give a display name first. Limit: 7 comments per day.

    Save a name to write a comment.

    No comments yet.