shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use B2B Lead Generation & Appointment Setting Services | Leads at Scale?

Trusted company with B2B marketing expertise. We can help you generate high-quality leads and increase your sales opportunities. - leadsatscale.com

Depends. Outsourced appointment setting fits funded B2B teams with $5k+/month pipeline budgets and a proven ICP; this vendor publishes no reviews, pricing, or security detail, so demand proof before signing. Small teams and low-ACV sellers should skip it and use a simple CRM or in-house outreach.

Confidence

Low. Based on 17 public sources; all are category-level — none directly review Leads at Scale.

Ratings

  • Value for moneyNo vendor pricing or ROI data published
  • Ease of useService, not software; no evidence
  • Feature depthOnly marketing tagline available
  • Support qualityNo vendor reviews; peers show mixed support
  • Security posture

Pricing

$150–$600 per meeting

Pay per appointment

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly fees$5,000–$16,000
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierNo
Monthly retainer$5,000–$16,000/month

Best for

  • Funded B2B sales teams
  • High-ACV, longer sales cycles
  • Teams without in-house SDRs
  • Buyers with $5k+/mo pipeline budgets

Not for

  • Small teams that just need a contact list
  • Low-deal-size sellers — meeting fees eat margin
  • Startups still validating their ideal customer profile
  • Buyers requiring published reviews or security proof

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Retainers hit $5,000–16,000/month; some agencies impose minimum contract terms

medium

Per-appointment pricing spans $150–600 per meeting; cheap meetings are often low quality — vet guarantees

medium

Peer agencies show G2 scores as low as 3.8 with support and quality complaints

medium

No security page; clarify data handling before sharing prospect lists

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Pay-per-appointment providers report 3–5x ROI
  • Outsourcing avoids recruiting in-house SDRs, a role with high turnover
  • Appointment setting converts cold calls into productive sales conversations
  • Peers claim 75+ booked calls monthly at scale

Cons

  • No security page published on vendor site
  • Some category agencies score 3.8/5 on G2 amid lead-quality complaints
  • Meetings cost $400–600; typical spend $5,000–16,000 monthly
  • Vendor site shows marketing claims without client names or metrics

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/20/2026 - 9 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x1review x4security x1news x3

Key stats

  • Security posture: 2/5

    Rating

  • $150–$600 per meeting

    Starting price

  • 9

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money. No vendor pricing or ROI data published
  • Ease of use. Service, not software; no evidence
  • Feature depth. Only marketing tagline available
  • Support quality. No vendor reviews; peers show mixed support
  • Security posture: 2/5. No security page found on site
  • $400–$600 Typical per-meeting cost Qualified B2B appointment, category-wide
  • $5,000–$16,000 Typical monthly budget Retainer or pay-per-appointment models
  • No Free tier Agencies bill per meeting or retainer
  • 0 Vendor reviews found No public ratings for Leads at Scale itself

Pricing

Pay per appointment

$150–$600 per meeting

  • Per qualified meeting
  • Claimed 3–5x ROI

Monthly retainer

$5,000–$16,000/month

  • Typical B2B appointment-setting budget
  • Roughly $400–600 per qualified meeting

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Quotable reviews describe category peers, not Leads at Scale specifically.

“Their B2B Lead Generation Service consistently finds decision-makers at corporate companies, and it's helped keep our pipeline healthy week after week.”
G2 reviewer

Alternatives

Compare B2B Lead Generation & Appointment Setting Services | Leads at Scale with each alternative.

Full analysis

Based on 17 public sources; all are category-level — none directly review Leads at Scale.

Category fits funded B2B teams; this vendor shows zero public reviews, pricing, or security proof.

Methodology

Based on 17 public sources; all are category-level — none directly review Leads at Scale.

Sources

  1. Leads at Scale homepageleadsatscale.com
    official
  2. security
  3. review
  4. review
  5. review
  6. news
  7. news
  8. review
  9. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.