Comparison
B2B Lead Generation & Appointment Setting Services | Leads at Scale and EBQ both land on Depends.
Outsourced appointment setting fits funded B2B teams with $5k+/month pipeline budgets and a proven ICP; this vendor publishes no reviews, pricing, or security detail, so demand proof before signing.
Buy if you're a B2B tech company that wants to rent a full sales/marketing function and can absorb a custom retainer.
| Compare | B2B Lead Generation & Appointment Setting Services | Leads at Scale | EBQ |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Funded B2B sales teams | Mid-market B2B tech firms without sales teams |
| Who it's not for | Small teams that just need a contact list | Small teams that just need a CRM |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.² | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | No vendor reviews; peers show mixed support | Users praise professionalism; turnover complaints exist |
| Public sentiment | Quotable reviews describe category peers, not Leads at Scale specifically.³ | Reviews are split: Clutch users praise professionalism and value, while a 3.9/5 G2 score and employee complaints about firings temper the picture.12 |
| Biggest gotcha | Retainers hit $5,000-16,000/month; some agencies impose minimum contract terms⁸ | No published pricing . custom flat monthly retainers scaled to capacity; negotiate before committing. |
