shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Legal 500?

Benchmarking excellence in law since 1987 - legal500.com

Depends. Buy if you are a law firm chasing a credibility ranking or a client shortlisting firms by practice area; browsing appears free and the coverage is genuinely global. Skip if you expected software or a cheap listing — this is a rankings publication with a heavy submission process and no published pricing.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 14 public sources; most are directory citations and firm announcements, with limited firsthand user reviews and no pricing data.

Ratings

  • Value for moneyNo pricing evidence found.
  • Ease of useNo usability evidence.
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo support evidence.
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Law firms chasing global credibility badges
  • In-house counsel shortlisting firms by practice
  • Consumers vetting lawyers (wills, private client)
  • Law students researching employers

Not for

  • Anyone shopping for software — it is a publication, not a tool
  • Solo or small firms wanting quick visibility; submissions are an annual grind
  • Buyers needing a verified security posture — no public security page
  • Budget planners — no pricing is published anywhere obvious

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

No public security page — verify data handling independently before sharing submission materials

medium

A directory-consultancy industry exists specifically to manage submissions — expect real staff time cost

low

Tier 1, Tier 2 and 'Recommended' are different levels; firms often promote only the flattering one

low

Competing directories (IFLR 1000 and others) are pitched side by side — pick per practice area

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Used by commercial and private clients to shortlist firms
  • Coverage spans over 100 countries
  • Firms publicly tout Tier 1 and Tier 2 rankings as wins
  • Market analysis and editorial commentary beyond bare rankings
  • Listed as a go-to resource by university careers services

Cons

  • Getting ranked requires substantial submissions; consultants exist just to navigate it
  • No security page found on the site
  • Tiers vary by jurisdiction and practice area; badges need careful reading

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/21/2026 - 9 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x3review x4security x1news x1

Key stats

  • Feature depth: 4/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 9

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money. No pricing evidence found.
  • Ease of use. No usability evidence.
  • Feature depth: 4/5. 100+ countries, tiered rankings, editorial commentary.
  • Support quality. No support evidence.
  • Security posture: 3/5. No known issues; but no public security page.
  • 1987 Benchmarking since Per its own tagline
  • 100+ countries Coverage Per website.informer listing
  • Tier 1 / Tier 2 / Recommended Ranking scale Examples: Gunster Tier 1, BlackOak Tier 2

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Rankings function mainly as marketing proof: law firms announce them proudly on LinkedIn, while consumers cite the guide when vetting lawyers.

“BlackOak is delighted to announce our ranking as 'Recommended' firm (Tier 2) for the practice area of Restructuring and Insolvency”
LinkedIn, BlackOak LLC
“Gunster is the only Florida-focused firm to receive the top ranking in the inaugural guide, which aims to recognize standout Private Client”
Gunster firm announcement

Alternatives

Compare Legal 500 with each alternative.

Companies that use it

  • Gunster²
  • BlackOak LLC³
  • Buterin Partners
  • Addleshaw Goddard⁵
  • Baker McKenzie⁵
Full analysis

Based on 14 public sources; most are directory citations and firm announcements, with limited firsthand user reviews and no pricing data.

A rankings directory, not software. Great shortlisting guide for clients; heavy submission grind for firms chasing tier badges.

Methodology

Based on 14 public sources; most are directory citations and firm announcements, with limited firsthand user reviews and no pricing data.

Sources

  1. Navigating different legal directory options for Asia-Pacificdanielsultanconsultancy.com
    review
  2. Gunster Top Ranked 'Tier 1' in U.S. Private Client Guidegunster.com
    news
  3. BlackOak LLC ranking announcementlinkedin.com
    review
  4. Legal 500 London rankings pagelegal500.com
    official
  5. Legal 500 United States rankings pagelegal500.com
    official
  6. Legal 500 security pagelegal500.com
    security
  7. Wills - who did you use? (Mumsnet)mumsnet.com
    review
  8. Newcastle University Careers Service listingncl.ac.uk
    review
  9. thelegal500.com site profilewebsite.informer.com
    official

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.