97/100
AcademicHelp score
Fact-checking sites review, 2025
Report
Should I Use Mediabiasfactcheck?
Depends
DependsUse it free as a first-pass check on a news outlet's bias and factuality — journalists and educators do.
Free human-run bias ratings for thousands of outlets; a starting point, not a verdict — rigor is disputed.
Confidence: Medium
3.3/5
Trustpilot
4 reviews
2.2/5
SmartCustomer
14 reviews
Free
Starting price
API is custom-quoted
Value for money
5
Free site; API is custom-quoted
Ease of use
4
Simple outlet lookup journalists use routinely
Feature depth
3
Bias, factuality, credibility ratings plus API; methodology thin
Pros
- Free, 100% independent, human-driven ratings per its about page.¹
- Rates political bias, factual accuracy, and credibility of news outlets.
- Used as a lateral-reading tool by a university news-literacy program.10
- Cited in a Nature journal study to classify source political slant.11
- Rated 97/100 by AcademicHelp's fact-checking site review.⁴
Cons
Gotchas
- highMethodology called informal by scholars; treat ratings as a starting point, never a verdict.⁹
- mediumAPI pricing is custom-quote only — no public numbers for budgeting.²
- mediumFor-profit funding; check its funding page before assuming neutrality.12
- lowMirror domains with bot-check walls exist; verify you're on the real site.
Best for
- Daily readers doing quick bias checks
- Media-literacy educators
- Researchers classifying outlet slant
- Developers wanting a ratings API
Not for
- Anyone needing peer-reviewed, auditable methodology
- Newsrooms needing defensible, citable bias certification
- People wanting one rating to settle what's true
- Teams needing enterprise media monitoring or SLAs
Companies that use it
- Penn State News Literacy Initiative10
Pricing
Website access
Free
- Bias and factuality ratings per outlet
- Daily vetted fact-check curation
- Factual news feed
Data API
Not disclosed
- Direct API access to ratings
- Contact editor@ for pricing
Security
No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.
What users say
Opinion is split: some journalists praise its breadth while critics and some reviewers dispute its rigor and neutrality.
“It's not perfect, but IMO there's no close 2nd.”
“I use Media Bias Fact Check very often to check articles and their sources”
“Mediabiasfactcheck has been repeatedly caught in lies and distortion”
Alternatives
Compare Mediabiasfactcheck with each alternative.
AllSides
Bias ratings with left/right/center comparisons and balanced headlines.
Mediabiasfactcheck vs AllSidesAd Fontes Media
Interactive Media Bias Chart scoring reliability and slant.
Mediabiasfactcheck vs Ad Fontes MediaNewsGuard
Journalist-written trust ratings for thousands of sites.
Mediabiasfactcheck vs NewsGuardGround News
Aggregator showing bias breakdown and blindspots per story.
Mediabiasfactcheck vs Ground NewsFull analysis
Based on 24 public sources: official pages, review sites, Reddit threads, and academic coverage. Review volumes are small, so sentiment signals are weak.
Sources
- About - Media Bias/Fact Checkmediabiasfactcheck.comofficial
- MBFC's Data APImediabiasfactcheck.comofficial
- Factual News - Media Bias/Fact Checkmediabiasfactcheck.comofficial
- Media Bias Fact Check Review 2025 - AcademicHelpacademichelp.netreview
- Trustpilot reviews - mediabiasfactcheck.comtrustpilot.comreview
- SmartCustomer reviews - Media Bias/Fact Checksmartcustomer.comreview
review
- Just Facts Daily - Media Bias Fact Check: Incompetent or Dishonest?justfactsdaily.comnews
- Factually.co - MBFC reviewfactually.coreview
- Penn State News Literacy Initiative - MBFC as a Tool for Lateral Readingnewsliteracy.psu.edunews
news
- InfluenceWatch - Media Bias/Fact Check profileinfluencewatch.orgnews
Rate this review
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Ask a follow-up
Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.