shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

PeerJ Review

Worth it

Should I use PeerJ?

Skip to main content - peerj.com

· 4 days ago

Researchers who need credible, affordable open-access publishing buy PeerJ. Software shoppers and authors chasing high-impact prestige do not.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 30 public sources, including Reddit threads, SciRev reviews, and official PeerJ pages.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of useNo direct usability evidence found
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo support-quality evidence found
  • Security posture

Pricing

$2,155 per article

Standard APC

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierNo
MembershipVaries; see FAQ
Institutional membershipCustom

Best for

  • Unfunded researchers needing affordable open access
  • Life sciences and computer science authors
  • Institutions buying blanket publishing deals
  • Authors who want peer reviews published openly

Not for

  • Anyone shopping for software; this is a journal
  • Authors chasing high-impact-factor prestige
  • Fields outside PeerJ's journal scope; check coverage first
  • Corporate buyers with no publishing needs

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Membership and APC options coexist; the FAQ compares them, so check before committing

medium

Waivers for lower-income authors exist but are not guaranteed

medium

Individual authors pay the APC unless an institutional membership covers them

low

Taylor & Francis bought PeerJ in 2024; pricing and policies can change

Pros and cons

Pros

  • $2,155 APC undercuts rivals like Cell Reports at $5,790
  • Peer reviews are published openly alongside articles
  • Authors report strong experiences publishing and reviewing there
  • Accepts preprints and covers computer science plus life sciences
  • Backed by Taylor & Francis after its 2024 acquisition

Cons

  • $2,155 per article is steep for unfunded authors
  • Rigorous review process slows acceptance versus lenient journals
  • Academics still debate its prestige versus legacy journals
  • Membership versus APC options add pricing complexity

Sources & method

- 14 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x7review x4security x1news x2

Key stats

  • Value for money: 4/5

    Rating

  • $2,155 per article

    Starting price

  • 14

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 4/5. $2,155 APC undercuts Cell Reports at $5,790
  • Ease of use. No direct usability evidence found
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Open reviews, preprints, multiple journals and article types
  • Support quality. No support-quality evidence found
  • Security posture: 4/5. Publishes security page; no public incidents found
  • $2,155 Starting APC Per article in PeerJ journal
  • $5,790 Rival APC Cell Reports, for comparison
  • 16,088 Publications indexed With 27,645 citations (Scispace)
  • Taylor & Francis Ownership Acquired in 2024

Pricing

Standard APC

$2,155 per article

  • Open-access publication
  • Open, published peer review

Membership

Varies; see FAQ

  • Fixed-term publishing plans
  • FAQ compares membership versus APC

Institutional membership

Not disclosed

  • Blanket coverage for researchers
  • Case studies at partner universities

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Authors on Reddit and forums describe PeerJ as credible and affordable, with occasional debate about prestige.

“I've published in PeerJ and also reviewed for”
Facebook, Reviewer 2 group
“Personally I've had great experienc”
Reddit, r/academia
“PeerJ sometimes waives publication fees”
SciRev.org review

Alternatives

Compare PeerJ with each alternative.

  • PLOS ONE

    Bigger-name open-access mega-journal; higher article fees.

  • MDPI journals

    Cheaper APCs, but academics debate the reputation.

  • Scientific Reports

    Guess: broad-scope open-access journal with a stronger brand.

Companies that use it

  • TU Delft14
  • Oregon State University
  • Memorial University
  • Carnegie Mellon
  • Arizona State University
Full analysis

Based on 30 public sources, including Reddit threads, SciRev reviews, and official PeerJ pages.

Legit, affordable open-access journal for researchers. Not software. Skip it if you chase prestige.

Methodology

Based on 30 public sources, including Reddit threads, SciRev reviews, and official PeerJ pages.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. official
  2. PeerJ pricingpeerj.com
    official
  3. official
  4. official
  5. official
  6. security
  7. Wikipedia: PeerJen.wikipedia.org
    news
  8. review
  9. review
  10. review
  11. review
  12. news
  13. official
  14. official

Add this review to your site

PeerJ earned a Worth it check.

Put the badge on your site, pricing page, or docs.

Visitors see an independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.