PeerJ
Worth it
Confidence: Medium
Researchers who need credible, affordable open-access publishing buy PeerJ.
New check
Comparison
PeerJ vs F1000Research
PeerJ lands on Worth it, and F1000Research lands on Depends.
F1000Research
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Publish here if you need fast, citable, open-access output . datasets, negative results, or funder-mandated open research.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Worth it | Depends |
| Best for | Unfunded researchers needing affordable open access | Fast, citable publication for datasets and methods |
| Who it's not for | Anyone shopping for software; this is a journal | Researchers chasing tenure-committee prestige brands |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁶ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | No support-quality evidence found | No support evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | Authors on Reddit and forums describe PeerJ as credible and affordable, with occasional debate about prestige.⁸ | Researchers on Reddit and ResearchGate praise the fast, transparent model but repeatedly question its rigor and prestige versus traditional journals. |
| Biggest gotcha | Membership and APC options coexist; the FAQ compares them, so check before committing⁴ | Authors pay an article processing charge; fees vary by article type . check before submitting.16 |
Pick PeerJ when
- Unfunded researchers needing affordable open access
- Life sciences and computer science authors
- Institutions buying blanket publishing deals
- Authors who want peer reviews published openly
When PeerJ is not a fit
- Anyone shopping for software; this is a journal
- Authors chasing high-impact-factor prestige
- Fields outside PeerJ's journal scope; check coverage first
- Corporate buyers with no publishing needs
Pick F1000Research when
- Fast, citable publication for datasets and methods
- Negative and null results
- Funder-mandated open research (UKRI-style)
- Posters and non-traditional outputs
When F1000Research is not a fit
- Researchers chasing tenure-committee prestige brands
- Anyone unwilling or unable to pay an APC
- Authors who want peer review before going public
- Teams needing a software tool . this is a journal, not software
Sources
- PeerJ homepagepeerj.comofficial
- PeerJ pricingpeerj.comofficial
- PeerJ benefits and price comparisonpeerj.comofficial
- PeerJ membership versus APC FAQpeerj.comofficial
- PeerJ published peer reviewspeerj.comofficial
- PeerJ security pagepeerj.comsecurity
- Wikipedia: PeerJen.wikipedia.orgnews
- Reddit: How legit is PeerJ?reddit.comreview
- Reddit: Thoughts on PeerJ?reddit.comreview
- Facebook Reviewer 2 group discussionfacebook.comreview
- SciRev.org reviews for PeerJscirev.orgreview
- Guardian: PeerJ low-cost open accesstheguardian.comnews
- Taylor & Francis PeerJ pagetandfonline.comofficial
- TU Delft case studypeerj.comofficial
- Publish fast. Openly. Without restrictions. (F1000 publishing model)think.f1000research.comofficial
- Article Processing Charges | F1000Researchf1000research.comofficial