shouldiuse.io

Report

Should I Use PostgreSQL?

postgresql.org·Analyzed 1 hour ago·Based on 13 sources

The official site for PostgreSQL, the world's most advanced open source database

Worth it

Worth it

Buy if your team can write SQL and own database operations — it is free, powerful, and proven at massive scale.

Free, powerful open source database. Great for technical teams; overkill if you just need a spreadsheet or contact list.

Confidence: High

4.4/5

G2 rating

682 reviews

$0

Starting price

Open source license

Yes

Free tier

Full engine, self-hosted

227,721

Adoption

Companies tracked using Postgres

Value for money5

Free to use, no license fees

Ease of use3

Guess: developer-friendly, steep for non-technical users

Feature depth5

Marketed as most advanced open source database

Support quality3

Guess: community support; paid via EDB, Percona

Security posture4

CVEs disclosed and patched quickly

Pros

  • Free to use with no licensing fees¹
  • Reviewers call it robust and powerful
  • Scales to millions of users — Instagram runs on it10
  • Huge adoption: 227,721 companies tracked using it
  • Deep managed-hosting ecosystem across AWS, Azure, DigitalOcean

Cons

  • No official vendor support; paid help via third parties like EDB
  • You must track and apply security patches yourself
  • Misconfiguration can compromise the database; hardening is your job
  • Key ecosystem tools like pgBackRest face open-source funding shortfalls13
  • Real costs hide in hosting and operations, not licensing

Gotchas

  • highCVE-2025-1094 saw real-world exploitation; patching discipline is mandatory.
  • mediumFree software, but total cost is hosting, ops staff, and optional paid support (EDB, Percona).
  • mediumDigitalOcean customers report continued billing after deleting Postgres databases.
  • mediumMigrating from Oracle can save ~90% in licensing, but migration itself is complex.

Best for

  • Engineering teams with SQL skills
  • High-growth apps needing serious scale
  • Companies fleeing Oracle license costs
  • Cost-conscious startups

Not for

  • Non-technical teams that just need a shared spreadsheet
  • Solo users tracking contacts or small lists
  • Companies with no DBA and no managed-hosting budget
  • Buyers expecting vendor SLA support out of the box

Companies that use it

  • Instagram10
  • Vanten Inc.

Pricing

Self-hosted

$0

  • Full-featured open source engine
  • Community support only

Managed cloud

from ~$14/mo

  • Azure Flexible Server entry tier
  • AWS RDS and DigitalOcean options
  • Vendor handles ops and backups

Security

Mature and actively patched — but 2025–2026 brought real CVEs, including one exploited in the wild.

  • CVE-2025-1094 — psql SQL injectionHigh-severity injection fixed by vendor; publicly exploited.
  • CVE-2026-2006 — remote code executionRCE vulnerability tracked in PostgreSQL.
  • CVE-2026-2003 — information disclosureInformation disclosure flaw tracked in PostgreSQL.

What users say

Developers consistently praise Postgres as robust, fast, and the default relational choice; the friction is operations, not the engine.

PostgreSQL is just nicer
Reddit, r/programming
It can be 100 times fast
Reddit, r/dotnet
Postgres is an excellent
Reddit, r/SQL

Alternatives

Compare PostgreSQL with each alternative.

Supabase

Managed Postgres with instant APIs; skips your ops work.

Full analysis

Based on ~45 public sources; several review snippets were truncated in capture, so user quotes are short fragments.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. security
  6. security
  7. security
  8. news
  9. news
  10. news
  11. official
  12. news
  13. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Ask a follow-up

Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.