4.9/5
Customer rating
500+ Pintura customers
Report
Designs and builds performant, responsive, and highly polished web components.
Worth it
Worth itBuy if your dev team needs polished file upload or in-app image editing — FilePond is free and Pintura is $149/yr.
Solo-built, well-loved JS components: free FilePond, $149/yr Pintura. Great for devs, useless for no-code teams.
4.9/5
Customer rating
500+ Pintura customers
$149/yr
Starting price
1 developer, 1 product
Yes
Free tier
FilePond is open source
2012
Founded
Solo founder, ~$120K ARR (2020)
$149/yr vs months of in-house build effort
Reddit users repeatedly call it easy to implement
Pintura covers crop, annotate, blur, video add-on
Testimonials praise support; solo founder does it all
CVE in Snippy plugin; no security page found
Free
$149/year
One CVE in the Snippy WordPress plugin; no dedicated security page published.
Developers praise the polish and easy implementation, though a minority call the paid licenses steep and one dismissed FilePond as looks-only.
“Just used this in a recent project! It’s easy to implement, has image previews, drag and”
“I can imagine that for some projects the price might be steep. You could decide to make your project open source under G”
“This is not the case of FilePond in my opinion. It looks cool and that's it.”
Compare Pqina with each alternative.
Free, open-source drag-and-drop file uploads.
Pqina vs Dropzone.jsPintura's closest commercial image-editing SDK rival.
Pqina vs IMG.LYFree open-source image cropping if that's all you need.
Pqina vs Cropper.js (fengyuanchen)Based on 14 public sources: vendor pages, GitHub, Reddit threads, CVE data, and company-data sites. No named customer companies were disclosed in the evidence.
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.