shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Project-redcap (REDCap) Review

Depends

Should I use Project-redcap (REDCap)?

Skip to content - project-redcap.org

· 2 days ago

Clinical and academic teams buy REDCap when their institution already hosts it. Small teams and business users do not buy it; they pick a simpler survey or spreadsheet tool.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 40+ public sources across reviews, security databases, pricing pages, and institutional sites.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

Free

Institutional access

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly fees$121
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
Per-project fees$121 per project

Best for

  • Clinical research teams
  • Universities and hospitals running studies
  • HIPAA-sensitive data collection
  • Multi-site trial coordinators

Not for

  • Small teams that need a simple contact list
  • Sales teams; this is not a CRM
  • Businesses without an institutional partner or admin budget
  • Casual survey creators; Qualtrics fits better

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Startup fees (for example $300) and per-project fees (for example $121) vary by institution.

medium

Support comes from your institution's admins; Reddit threads show users stuck on import and saving bugs.

medium

Self-hosted instances carry 41 logged CVEs; patching depends on your institution.

low

Pricing details sit behind each institution; no transparent public rate card.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free to member institutions
  • Over 8,100 institutional partners and 1M+ users
  • Listed among HIPAA-compliant survey options
  • Validated for secure multi-site trial data
  • Offline mobile app for field data collection

Cons

  • Steep learning curve intimidates new users
  • Access usually requires an institutional license
  • Users report large instruments failing to save
  • Data import tool issues reported by users
  • No public price list; fees vary by institution

Sources & method

- 10 sources - 41 CVEs are logged; risk depends on each institution's hosting and patching.

official x3review x4security x1news x2
  • CVE-2013-4611, Critical severity vulnerability is logged against REDCap.
  • CVE-2021-42136, A vulnerability record exists in the official CVE database.
  • 41 CVEs logged, OpenCVE tracks 41 vulnerabilities for REDCap under Vanderbilt.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • Free

    Starting price

  • 10

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free for member institutions; low per-project fees
  • Ease of use: 3/5. Users report easy basics but intimidating setup
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Deep survey and study tools, mobile app included
  • Support quality: 2/5. Support comes from local admins, not a vendor
  • Security posture: 3/5. 41 public CVEs; patching depends on host institution
  • 8,100+ Institutional partners Over 1 million users by 2019
  • Free Cost via institution Access is free to member institutions
  • $121 Typical per-project fee Baylor fee; some sites charge a $300 startup
  • 221 G2 reviews Seller profile review count

Pricing

Institutional access

Free

  • Free to consortium member institutions
  • Hosted by your university or hospital

Per-project fees

$121 per project

  • Baylor charges $121 per project
  • Some sites charge a $300 startup fee

Security

41 CVEs are logged; risk depends on each institution's hosting and patching.

  • CVE-2013-4611Critical severity vulnerability is logged against REDCap.
  • CVE-2021-42136A vulnerability record exists in the official CVE database.
  • 41 CVEs loggedOpenCVE tracks 41 vulnerabilities for REDCap under Vanderbilt.⁵

What users say

Users find REDCap easy for basics but intimidating at first, and some hit bugs with imports and large forms.

“Overall, REDCap is easy”
SoftwareWorld review
“REDCap can seem intimidating”
Reddit, r/clinicalresearch

Alternatives

Compare Project-redcap (REDCap) with each alternative.

  • Castor EDC

    Commercial EDC with vendor support for clinical trials.

  • Qualtrics

    Simpler survey tool for teams outside clinical research.

    Project-redcap (REDCap) vs Qualtrics
  • Google Sheets

    Handles simple contact lists and small surveys for free.

Companies that use it

  • Baylor University⁷
  • UCSF
  • Penn State
  • University of Bristol
  • Northwestern University
Full analysis

Based on 40+ public sources across reviews, security databases, pricing pages, and institutional sites.

Free research data capture for universities and hospitals. Wrong fit for small teams or business surveys.

Methodology

Based on 40+ public sources across reviews, security databases, pricing pages, and institutional sites.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. security
  6. Product security pageproject-redcap.org
    official
  7. REDCap | HelpDesk+ | Baylor Universityhelpdeskplus.web.baylor.edu
    official
  8. news
  9. official
  10. news

Add this review to your site

This check for Project-redcap (REDCap) says Depends.

Put the badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.