Airtasker
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Fine if you're a homeowner posting occasional odd jobs and vetting workers carefully.
New check
Comparison
Airtasker and Upwork both land on Depends.
Fine if you're a homeowner posting occasional odd jobs and vetting workers carefully.
Good fit if you occasionally need freelance help and can stomach the fee stack; poor fit for full-time hires or freelancers who can find work elsewhere.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | One-off household tasks | Occasional freelance hires |
| Who it's not for | Tradespeople running a full-time business | Full-time, long-term hires |
| Privacy | 2018 third-party Typeform breach exposed some Airtasker user data; no dedicated security page found.⁶ | Runs a HackerOne bug bounty and enterprise security program; one alleged, unconfirmed recruiter/freelancer database leak circulated. |
| Support quality | Complaint process skewed; 1.6/5 elsewhere | PissedConsumer and Trustpilot complaint volume; dispute stories |
| Public sentiment | Reviews are polarized: 4.3/5 on Trustpilot versus 1.6/5 on PissedConsumer, with workers recurring complaints about fees and one-sided disputes.¹ | Sentiment splits: clients still find talent easily, but many freelancers and some clients say fees, Connects, and support have eroded the value.13 |
| Biggest gotcha | Tiered service fees plus connection fees stack up for workers; budget your margin before bidding⁷ | Freelancers buy Connects per bid; spend adds up before earning anything |