4.3/5
Trustpilot
Cited as 'Excellent' in Trustpilot case study
Report
Depends
DependsFine if you're a homeowner posting occasional odd jobs and vetting workers carefully.
Local-task marketplace: OK for odd jobs, costly for pros — 12.5–20% cuts and polarized reviews.
4.3/5
Trustpilot
Cited as 'Excellent' in Trustpilot case study
1.6/5
PissedConsumer
366 reviews
12.5–20%
Fees
Of every completed task
2012
Founded
Sydney; $56.2M raised over 11 rounds
12.5–20% cut per task, both sides
Self-serve posting; app reviews positive
Complaint process skewed; 1.6/5 elsewhere
2018 Typeform breach; no security page found
Free to post
12.5–20% per task
Paid subscription
2018 third-party Typeform breach exposed some Airtasker user data; no dedicated security page found.
Reviews are polarized: 4.3/5 on Trustpilot versus 1.6/5 on PissedConsumer, with workers recurring complaints about fees and one-sided disputes.
“Airtasker takes a chunk from each end.”
“Airtasker is not a secure or reliable platform”
“Airtasker has been the better platform for me.”
Compare Airtasker with each alternative.
AU home services; workers pay no commission
Airtasker vs hipagesBigger US in-person task marketplace
Better for digital and remote freelance work
Airtasker vs UpworkFixed-price gigs, no bidding competition
Airtasker vs FiverrBased on 30+ public sources: app-store and Trustpilot reviews, Reddit threads, complaint sites, pricing docs, and news.
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.
Comments
One queue. No replies. Give a display name first. Limit: 7 comments per day.
No comments yet.