Pricing — Amp
Depends
Confidence: Low
Buy only if you are a working developer or engineering team with heavy coding volume and tolerance for usage-based billing.
Comparison
Pricing — Amp and Cursor both land on Depends.
Buy only if you are a working developer or engineering team with heavy coding volume and tolerance for usage-based billing.
Buy if you are a professional developer or engineering team shipping code daily and can absorb usage-based costs.
| Compare | Pricing — Amp | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Professional developers with daily coding volume | Professional developers shipping daily |
| Who it's not for | Non-developers . this is purely a coding tool | Casual coders who will hit Pro limits and hate overages |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.³ | Active CVE stream 2025-2026 including remote code execution; patch fast and lock down agent permissions.16 |
| Support quality | No support evidence in sources | Refund fights and 1.6/5 Trustpilot |
| Public sentiment | Sources reviewed contain almost no verbatim user sentiment, mostly third-party pricing explainers.⁶ | Developers broadly praise Cursor's agent productivity and autocomplete, but many turned critical after 2025 pricing changes and quality dips.11 |
| Biggest gotcha | Custom pricing per reviewers: expect to dig into docs or talk to the vendor before budgeting⁴ | Usage pricing is opaque; power users report $200+/month vs the $20 plan |