Annot
Depends
Confidence: Low
Buy only if you're a freelancer or tiny agency that needs cheap website markup at $9/mo . low cost, low risk.
New check
Comparison
Annot and Figma both land on Depends.
Buy only if you're a freelancer or tiny agency that needs cheap website markup at $9/mo . low cost, low risk.
Buy it if you are a product or design team building user interfaces together every week . it is the category standard and the free tier is genuinely usable.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Freelancers collecting client website feedback | Product and UX teams shipping software who design together daily |
| Who it's not for | Enterprises needing SOC 2, SSO, or a working security page | Solo freelancers or small teams that only need occasional simple mockups . a paid seat plan here is overkill; Penpot, Balsamiq, or even a template will do |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.² | Figma advertises SOC 2 Type 2, SSO, and a trust center, but 2025 was rough: Figma's own Data Processing Addendum discloses a security breach caused by a command injection, a command-injection CVE exists in Figma Desktop for Windows, and two RCE vulnerabilities were found in the third-party Framelink Figma MCP server that many teams connect to Figma. |
| Public sentiment | No substantive independent user reviews surfaced in the sources reviewed.⁶ | Aggregate sentiment is strongly positive on the core product . 4.6 stars on G2 with real-time collaboration as the standout strength and users saying it speeds up layout work significantly.11 |
| Biggest gotcha | Security page returns 404 . verify SOC 2/SSO needs before relying on it² | Seat-type sprawl is the big trap: full editor seats, Dev Mode seats, and cheap collaborator seats (around $5/month) mean your real cost depends on who touches files . model this before committing14 |