Authorea
Depends
Confidence: Medium
A fit if you are a researcher wanting free collaborative writing plus a citable open preprint.
New check
Comparison
Authorea and Overleaf both land on Depends.
A fit if you are a researcher wanting free collaborative writing plus a citable open preprint.
Buy it if you or your team writes in LaTeX and collaborates . it is the category default with 30M+ users and university backing.
| Compare | Authorea | Overleaf |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Academic researchers co-writing manuscripts | Academic paper co-authoring |
| Who it's not for | Business or marketing teams . academic-only tooling | Writers who don't need LaTeX markup |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.11 | FedRAMP-authorized for government use; two moderate CVEs disclosed Sept 2024; open-source with public advisories. |
| Support quality | No support evidence in sources. | No reliable support-rating evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | Reddit and forum threads show researchers using it for preprints and collaborative writing, with mixed opinions and frequent comparisons to Overleaf.⁶ | Users broadly treat Overleaf as the standard for collaborative LaTeX but gripe about free-tier limits, recent product changes, and whether Pro is worth paying for. |
| Biggest gotcha | Publishing creates a public DOI preprint; check your target journal's preprint policy first.⁵ | Free plan limits (collaborators, compile time, storage) are the main upsell trigger . check before committing. |