Beallslist
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Researchers, librarians, and authors use this free list as a first check for predatory journals.
New check
Comparison
Beallslist lands on Depends, and Doaj lands on Worth it.
Researchers, librarians, and authors use this free list as a first check for predatory journals.
Free, community-funded index that is the de facto whitelist for legitimate open-access journals . researchers, librarians and funders should use it.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Worth it |
| Best for | Researchers choosing where to submit | Researchers vetting open-access journals |
| Who it's not for | Anyone needing updated, evidence-backed verdicts | Buyers wanting a purchasable SaaS tool with support SLAs |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁹ | No public vulnerabilities found for DOAJ itself; a 2025 XSS CVE affects a third-party WordPress export plugin, not. |
| Support quality | Anonymous maintainer, no support or appeal path. | No support quality evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | Academics treat the list as a useful but imperfect and contested first-pass screening tool.⁴ | Researchers and librarians treat DOAJ as the free go-to whitelist for legitimate open-access journals, while some debate whether it carries the same weight as Scopus.14 |
| Biggest gotcha | No support channel and no appeal process for wrongly listed journals.⁶ | Fake journals claim DOAJ indexing; always verify on itself, not the journal's site12 |