Bun
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Try Bun for new JS/TS projects, scripts, and tooling . it is free, fast, and npm-compatible.
Comparison
Bun lands on Depends, and pnpm lands on Worth it.
Try Bun for new JS/TS projects, scripts, and tooling . it is free, fast, and npm-compatible.
Adopt it if you write JavaScript . it is free, installs 2-3× faster than npm, and cuts disk use 50-70%.
| Compare | Bun | pnpm |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Worth it |
| Best for | New JS/TS projects wanting one fast toolchain | JavaScript/Node teams with heavy dependency trees |
| Who it's not for | Production-critical apps that cannot absorb runtime churn | Non-JavaScript projects . it only manages Node packages |
| Privacy | Two recent CVEs (command injection, trusted-dependencies spoofing) plus active malware campaigns abusing the runtime. | Actively maintained with a published security policy, but multiple 2026 CVEs (path traversal, one critical) . keep it updated. |
| Support quality | Post-acquisition support called limited and deprecated | Community OSS; no support evidence found |
| Public sentiment | Users praise Bun's speed and resource efficiency, but the 1.4 Rust rewrite and post-acquisition support draw criticism.¹ | Third-party benchmarks and developer write-ups consistently confirm the speed and disk claims, with Bun as the main speed rival. |
| Biggest gotcha | Acquired December 2025 with zero revenue; priorities may shift toward Anthropic's goals.⁶ | Critical path-traversal CVE disclosed; run latest version and pin upgrades |