Dapple
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you run awards, literary magazines, gallery open calls, or university applications and want a free start with pay-as-you-grow pricing.
New check
Comparison
Dapple and Submittable both land on Depends.
Buy if you run awards, literary magazines, gallery open calls, or university applications and want a free start with pay-as-you-grow pricing.
Buy if you run grant programs, contests, or application cycles with real reviewer workflows . 11,000+ organizations do.
| Compare | Dapple | Submittable |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Awards and prize organisers | Grantmakers and CSR teams |
| Who it's not for | Sales teams wanting a CRM . this is not one | Anyone needing a basic form or contact list |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁷ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | No support evidence found | 'Excellent customer service' per Software Advice reviewers |
| Public sentiment | Independent user feedback is scarce . one literary-magazine reviewer briefly trialled Dapple and third-party listings carry no ratings yet.11 | Organizations praise the workflow tooling and support, while writers and small magazines complain about fees and some feature limits.14 |
| Biggest gotcha | Plan prices aren't published in the sources reviewed . confirm costs before piloting² | Costs scale badly for small journals; CLMP discount only for qualifying literary orgs. |