DeepSource
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you're a growing engineering team on GitHub that wants code review, quality checks, and security scanning in one tool.
New check
Comparison
DeepSource and G2 both land on Depends.
Buy if you're a growing engineering team on GitHub that wants code review, quality checks, and security scanning in one tool.
Buyers shortlisting B2B software should use G2 free as one input, cross-checked against Capterra or TrustRadius.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Growing teams shipping AI-written code | B2B software buyers shortlisting tools |
| Who it's not for | Solo devs . free linters and GitHub Actions suffice | Vendors without five-figure budgets |
| Privacy | One public incident: 2020 Sawfish phishing compromised employee credentials and a GitHub token; logins were reset.12 | No public security page found; UpGuard reports no phishing; G2's own DPA references a past data breach. |
| Support quality | No support evidence found | Trustpilot and BBB complaints about G2's service |
| Public sentiment | G2, Capterra, and Gartner reviewers are broadly positive with ease of use standing out, while some Reddit threads still steer teams toward SonarQube.⁴ | Buyers find G2 useful for breadth, but sentiment on G2's own service skews negative on Trustpilot and Redditors weigh it against Capterra and Trustpilot. |
| Biggest gotcha | Committer-based billing: cost tracks active committers, so growing teams pay more³ | Vendor contracts are negotiated and opaque; budget five figures annually before committing. |