Devin
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you run a serious engineering team with backlog debt, budget for seats plus usage credits, and review discipline.
New check
Comparison
Devin and Cursor both land on Depends.
Buy if you run a serious engineering team with backlog debt, budget for seats plus usage credits, and review discipline.
Buy if you are a professional developer or engineering team shipping code daily and can absorb usage-based costs.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Eng teams with big backlogs | Professional developers shipping daily |
| Who it's not for | Solo developers and hobby projects | Casual coders who will hit Pro limits and hate overages |
| Privacy | One public CVE (CVE-2024-56083) plus documented secret-leak research; vendor now ships its own security tooling.11 | Active CVE stream 2025-2026 including remote code execution; patch fast and lock down agent permissions. |
| Support quality | No support evidence in sources | Refund fights and 1.6/5 Trustpilot |
| Public sentiment | Opinion is split: users praise autonomy and speed, while critics cite inconsistency and weak architectural judgment.¹ | Developers broadly praise Cursor's agent productivity and autocomplete, but many turned critical after 2025 pricing changes and quality dips.15 |
| Biggest gotcha | ACU usage billing: Devin Review consumes credits beyond the seat fee . set cost controls first. | Usage pricing is opaque; power users report $200+/month vs the $20 plan |