Elsevier
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Worth using if your institution's library pays and your field's top journals are Elsevier.
Comparison
Elsevier lands on Depends, and Doaj lands on Worth it.
Worth using if your institution's library pays and your field's top journals are Elsevier.
Free, community-funded index that is the de facto whitelist for legitimate open-access journals . researchers, librarians and funders should use it.
| Compare | Elsevier | Doaj |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Worth it |
| Best for | University libraries with big budgets | Researchers vetting open-access journals |
| Who it's not for | Unfunded authors paying APCs personally | Buyers wanting a purchasable SaaS tool with support SLAs |
| Privacy | No public CVEs found, but third-party reports flag a domain hijack and leaked credentials.⁶ | No public vulnerabilities found for DOAJ itself; a 2025 XSS CVE affects a third-party WordPress export plugin, not.16 |
| Support quality | Trustpilot 1.8, 'Poor' | No support quality evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | Acadics vent about fees, unpaid reviewing, and clunky tools; Trustpilot sits at 1.8 'Poor'.¹ | Researchers and librarians treat DOAJ as the free go-to whitelist for legitimate open-access journals, while some debate whether it carries the same weight as Scopus.13 |
| Biggest gotcha | APCs are set per journal; check the exact fee before submitting anything⁴ | Fake journals claim DOAJ indexing; always verify on itself, not the journal's site11 |