Endtest
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you need codeless, no-code test automation and reviewers' ease-of-use theme matches your QA team.
New check
Comparison
Endtest and Selenium both land on Depends.
Buy if you need codeless, no-code test automation and reviewers' ease-of-use theme matches your QA team.
Buy if you have engineers to write and maintain browser test suites at scale . it's the free industry standard.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Non-coder QA teams | QA teams with coding skills |
| Who it's not for | Dev teams already fluent in Playwright or Selenium | Teams without engineers . tests are code and break constantly |
| Privacy | ISO 27001 certified with public security, subprocessor, and privacy pages; no breaches found in sources reviewed.11 | Multiple public CVEs, mostly Selenium Grid; a critical flaw in an old Docker hub image and in-the-wild cryptomining abuse of exposed Grids. |
| Support quality | No clear evidence either way | Community and sponsorship only; no vendor support |
| Public sentiment | Reviewers praise simplicity and ease of use, though the public review base is small.¹ | Users value its free flexibility but consistently flag coding demands, brittle tests, and heavy maintenance.15 |
| Biggest gotcha | Guess: codeless tests live in Endtest's proprietary format; migrating to Playwright or Selenium later likely means rebuilding. | Free tool, expensive operation: you pay for Grid hosting, CI infrastructure, and engineers' time. |