shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Endtest?

Codeless, agentic AI test automation for web and mobile apps - endtest.io

Depends. Buy if you need codeless, no-code test automation and reviewers' ease-of-use theme matches your QA team. Skip it if your engineers can maintain Playwright or Selenium for free, or you want a large, stable vendor.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~20 public sources; many snippets were truncated and no public pricing figures were found.

Ratings

  • Value for moneyNo pricing evidence in sources
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo clear evidence either way
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Non-coder QA teams
  • Web and mobile regression testing
  • Teams avoiding Selenium script maintenance

Not for

  • Dev teams already fluent in Playwright or Selenium
  • Buyers wanting self-hosted open-source tooling
  • Anyone needing transparent published pricing
  • Enterprises wanting Tricentis-scale vendor stability

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Guess: codeless tests live in Endtest's proprietary format; migrating to Playwright or Selenium later likely means rebuilding.

medium

No pricing figures in sources reviewed; clarify per-user versus execution-minute billing before committing.

medium

Company is small (~$440K ARR); ask about support SLAs and roadmap commitment.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Reviewers repeatedly cite ease of use and simplicity
  • Rated 4+ on G2 across 60 reviews
  • ISO 27001 certified; publishes security and subprocessor pages
  • Handles tricky UI like Shadow DOM and web components
  • Integrates with Azure DevOps and SolarWinds incident response

Cons

  • Tiny vendor: roughly $440K estimated ARR in 2025
  • Small review base: 60 G2 reviews versus rivals' thousands
  • No pricing figures surfaced in sources reviewed; confirm before demos

Sources & method

Analyzed 10/05/2026 - 12 sources - ISO 27001 certified with security, subprocessor, and privacy pages; no breaches found in sources reviewed.

official x2review x6security x2news x2

Key stats

  • Ease of use: 5/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 12

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money. No pricing evidence in sources
  • Ease of use: 5/5. Multiple reviews praise simplicity
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Cross-browser, mobile, Shadow DOM, accessibility, CI integrations
  • Support quality. No clear evidence either way
  • Security posture: 4/5. ISO 27001; public security and subprocessor pages
  • 4+/5 G2 rating 60 G2 reviews
  • $440K ARR Est. revenue 2025 estimate (GetLatka)
  • Yes ISO 27001 Per Endtest's own site

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

ISO 27001 certified with security, subprocessor, and privacy pages; no breaches found in sources reviewed.

What users say

Reviewers praise simplicity and ease of use, though the review base is small.

“Endtest is simple to use”
Capterra review
Full analysis

Based on ~20 public sources; many snippets were truncated and no public pricing figures were found.

Codeless AI test automation praised for ease of use; tiny vendor, opaque pricing, and free Playwright/Selenium undercut it for dev teams.

Methodology

Based on ~20 public sources; many snippets were truncated and no public pricing figures were found.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. review
  6. review
  7. news
  8. news
  9. official
  10. official
  11. security
  12. security

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.