Endtest
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you need codeless, no-code test automation and reviewers' ease-of-use theme matches your QA team.
New check
Comparison
Endtest lands on Depends, and TestingBot lands on Worth it.
Buy if you need codeless, no-code test automation and reviewers' ease-of-use theme matches your QA team.
Buy if you are a small-to-mid dev team wanting cloud Selenium, mobile and visual testing well below BrowserStack's price.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Worth it |
| Best for | Non-coder QA teams | Small dev teams running Selenium/Appium in CI |
| Who it's not for | Dev teams already fluent in Playwright or Selenium | Enterprises needing SLAs and dedicated support . vendor runs under $1M revenue |
| Privacy | ISO 27001 certified with public security, subprocessor, and privacy pages; no breaches found in sources reviewed.11 | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | No clear evidence either way | Service praised, but vendor is a tiny team |
| Public sentiment | Reviewers praise simplicity and ease of use, though the public review base is small.¹ | Reviewers praise results and service, though some report slow manual-testing connections, and Reddit often recommends it as a budget BrowserStack alternative.15 |
| Biggest gotcha | Guess: codeless tests live in Endtest's proprietary format; migrating to Playwright or Selenium later likely means rebuilding. | Parallel slots are billed add-ons; concurrency costs grow as you scale CI |