Endtest
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you need codeless, no-code test automation and reviewers' ease-of-use theme matches your QA team.
New check
Comparison
Endtest and Testsigma both land on Depends.
Buy if you need codeless, no-code test automation and reviewers' ease-of-use theme matches your QA team.
Buy if you're a mid-size QA team replacing brittle Selenium suites with maintainable no-code tests.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Non-coder QA teams | Mid-size QA teams scaling regression |
| Who it's not for | Dev teams already fluent in Playwright or Selenium | Solo devs and two-person teams . Playwright is free |
| Privacy | ISO 27001 certified with public security, subprocessor, and privacy pages; no breaches found in sources reviewed.11 | Trust center, MFA guidance, and a vulnerability disclosure program exist; one low-severity CVE affects the Jenkins plugin, not the core platform. |
| Support quality | No clear evidence either way | No consistent evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | Reviewers praise simplicity and ease of use, though the public review base is small.¹ | Reviews praise the no-code authoring and AI features, while Reddit threads and competitor comparisons question pricing transparency and value for smaller teams.14 |
| Biggest gotcha | Guess: codeless tests live in Endtest's proprietary format; migrating to Playwright or Selenium later likely means rebuilding. | Real tier pricing requires sales contact; $99/mo Startup plan is the only visible number |