F1000Research
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Publish here if you need fast, citable, open-access output . datasets, negative results, or funder-mandated open research.
New check
Comparison
F1000Research vs Biorxiv
F1000Research lands on Depends, and Biorxiv lands on Worth it.
Biorxiv
Worth it
Confidence: Medium
Use bioRxiv if you're a life-sciences researcher who wants a free, fast, citable way to release a manuscript before journal review.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Worth it |
| Best for | Fast, citable publication for datasets and methods | Life-sciences researchers pre-publication |
| Who it's not for | Researchers chasing tenure-committee prestige brands | Clinical/medical research . use medRxiv instead |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁶ | No breaches found; one open XSS report on the submission portal and a past Cloudflare outage. |
| Support quality | No support evidence in sources | No support evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | Researchers on Reddit and ResearchGate praise the fast, transparent model but repeatedly question its rigor and prestige versus traditional journals. | Researchers on Reddit and academic forums report broadly positive preprint experiences, with recurring worries about scooping and journal attitudes. |
| Biggest gotcha | Authors pay an article processing charge; fees vary by article type . check before submitting.² | Site has gone fully offline before (Cloudflare outage); don't bet a deadline on uptime. |
Pick F1000Research when
- Fast, citable publication for datasets and methods
- Negative and null results
- Funder-mandated open research (UKRI-style)
- Posters and non-traditional outputs
When F1000Research is not a fit
- Researchers chasing tenure-committee prestige brands
- Anyone unwilling or unable to pay an APC
- Authors who want peer review before going public
- Teams needing a software tool . this is a journal, not software
Pick Biorxiv when
- Life-sciences researchers pre-publication
- Labs staking priority claims fast
- Authors wanting free citable DOIs
- Text/data miners needing an open API
When Biorxiv is not a fit
- Clinical/medical research . use medRxiv instead
- Physics, math, CS authors . arXiv is the fit
- Anyone needing peer review before release
- Teams whose target journals penalize preprints
Sources
- Publish fast. Openly. Without restrictions. (F1000 publishing model)think.f1000research.comofficial
- Article Processing Charges | F1000Researchf1000research.comofficial
- Publishing Policies | F1000Researchf1000research.comofficial
- Prepublication Checks | F1000Researchf1000research.comofficial
- UKRI - F1000 Researchthink.f1000research.comofficial
- F1000Research product security pagef1000research.comsecurity
- How Rigorous Is the Post-publication Review Process at F1000 Research?scholarlykitchen.sspnet.orgreview
news
- Thoughts on F1000Research? (r/labrats)reddit.comreview
- Is submitting a paper to F1000Research journal a good idea?researchgate.netreview
news
- F1000Research - Crunchbase Company Profile & Fundingcrunchbase.comnews
news
- F1000Research | Open Access Publishing Platformf1000research.comofficial
- bioRxiv FAQbiorxiv.orgofficial
- Machine access and TDM resourcesbiorxiv.orgofficial