FlowRunner
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you're a Backendless user or ops team wanting cheap visual orchestration with human-approval steps built in.
Comparison
FlowRunner and Make both land on Depends.
Buy if you're a Backendless user or ops team wanting cheap visual orchestration with human-approval steps built in.
Buy if you run complex, multi-step automations and will actively track credit usage.
| Compare | FlowRunner | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Backendless users | Ops teams with multi-step, branching automations |
| Who it's not for | Teams needing hundreds of app integrations | Anyone needing one or two simple app connections |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁹ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | No support evidence in sources | No support evidence in reviewed sources |
| Public sentiment | G2 and Capterra reviewers describe a visual workflow tool that solves real problems, while third-party reviews flag billing surprises.³ | Users praise Make's visual builder and breadth of app connections, often adopting it after hitting Zapier's limits on complex workflows.11 |
| Biggest gotcha | Variable billing can spike costs; Backendless users report billing issues on scale plans.⁸ | Real monthly cost requires 'real math'; usage spikes can outgrow your plan quickly |