GetStow
Depends
Confidence: Low
Try the free plan if you run a small field team losing serialized gear between warehouse and client sites; evidence is mostly vendor-published, so confidence is low.
New check
Comparison
GetStow and Cheqroom both land on Depends.
Try the free plan if you run a small field team losing serialized gear between warehouse and client sites; evidence is mostly vendor-published, so confidence is low.
Buy it if you run a large shared equipment fleet at a university, film studio, or corporate AV department.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Field service teams deploying gear to client sites | Universities loaning AV gear |
| Who it's not for | Warehouse or retail stock control . inFlow or Sortly fit better | Small teams with a few dozen assets |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁴ | SOC 2 Type II certified with a public trust center and security overview; no public vulnerabilities found. |
| Support quality | No evidence | No support quality evidence in reviewed sources. |
| Public sentiment | No independent user reviews were found; the product's directory listing shows zero reviews.⁸ | Users rate Cheqroom 4.5/5 on G2 and call it easy to use, stable, and accessible for equipment checkout.10 |
| Biggest gotcha | Loan management excluded from free tier . starts at €19/month.³ | Competitor marketing cites massive price increases; negotiate renewal caps in writing. |