Comparison

Gogs: A painless self-hosted Git service vs Gitea

Gogs: A painless self-hosted Git service and Gitea both land on Depends.
gogs.io
Buy if you want a free, lightweight Git server on your own hardware and someone on the team can run it.
Read the full report
gitea.io
Buy if your team wants a free, self-hosted GitHub-style forge and can run and patch a server yourself.
Read the full report
Add this comparison to your site
Put the Gogs: A painless self-hosted Git service vs Gitea badge on your site.
Visitors see the independent comparison.
The link points here, and search engines follow it.
This is the badge visitors see on your site.
Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.
Gogs: A painless self-hosted Git service versus Gitea| Compare | Gogs: A painless self-hosted Git service | Gitea |
|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
|---|
| Best for | Self-hosters and hobbyists | Self-hosting dev teams |
|---|
| Who it's not for | Enterprises needing CI/CD and vendor support | Teams wanting zero-maintenance managed hosting |
|---|
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed; vendor states all CVEs are fixed in the latest stable release. |
|---|
| Support quality | No support evidence in sources | No support evidence in sources |
|---|
| Public sentiment | Users praise Gogs as lightweight and painless to deploy, though many self-hosters now favor its forks. | No independent user reviews found; all quotes in sources are vendor marketing copy. |
|---|
| Biggest gotcha | Free software means paid ops: updates, backups, and security patching fall on your team. | 2022 governance split: company formed, Codeberg forked to Forgejo; fork risk persists |
|---|
Pick Gogs: A painless self-hosted Git service when
- Self-hosters and hobbyists
- Small dev teams
- Low-resource or ARM hardware
- Privacy-conscious teams
When Gogs: A painless self-hosted Git service is not a fit
- Enterprises needing CI/CD and vendor support
- Teams with nobody to run and patch a server
- Buyers wanting fast-moving features . forks are ahead
- Non-technical teams wanting zero-config hosting
Pick Gitea when
- Self-hosting dev teams
- Cost-conscious startups
- Orgs needing code/data control
- GitHub Actions users wanting on-prem CI
When Gitea is not a fit
- Teams wanting zero-maintenance managed hosting
- Enterprises needing vendor SLAs and dedicated support
- Buyers wary of fork or governance risk
- Non-technical teams . this is developer tooling
Sources
official
official
official
security
review
review
review
official
news
About Giteaabout.gitea.com official
official
Gitea Pricingabout.gitea.com official
Gitea Securityabout.gitea.com security
official