Good Grants vs Dapple

Good Grants and Dapple both land on Depends.

Good Grants

Depends

Confidence: Medium

Buy it if you run recurring, multi-round grant programs with many applicants and reviewers and can absorb roughly AUD 10,700 per year.

Depends

Confidence: Medium

Buy if you run awards, literary magazines, gallery open calls, or university applications and want a free start with pay-as-you-grow pricing.

Good Grants versus Dapple
Compare	Good Grants	Dapple
Verdict	Depends	Depends
Best for	Funders running open, multi-round grant programs	Awards and prize organisers
Who it's not for	Small nonprofits running one simple annual grant . use a form plus spreadsheet	Sales teams wanting a CRM . this is not one
Privacy	No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.^³	No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.
Support quality	No support reviews found in sources	No support evidence found
Public sentiment	Reviews on G2, Capterra and SoftwareAdvice are broadly positive, while Reddit nonprofit threads weigh Good Grants against alternatives like AIMS for grant management.^⁶	Independent user feedback is scarce . one literary-magazine reviewer briefly trialled Dapple and third-party listings carry no ratings yet.
Biggest gotcha	AI features carry separate per-field pricing; costs can add up.¹²	Plan prices aren't published in the sources reviewed . confirm costs before piloting¹⁴

Small nonprofits running one simple annual grant . use a form plus spreadsheet
Grantseekers hunting for funding; this is software for grantmakers, not applicants
Teams wanting a donor or fundraising CRM . grant tools don't do CRM
Anyone without roughly 11k AUD annual software budget