Gumloop
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy it if your team builds multi-step AI workflows at scale and wants IT-governed access and compliance.
Comparison
Gumloop and Make both land on Depends.
Buy it if your team builds multi-step AI workflows at scale and wants IT-governed access and compliance.
Buy if you run complex, multi-step automations and will actively track credit usage.
| Compare | Gumloop | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Marketing and ops teams automating research and data workflows | Ops teams with multi-step, branching automations |
| Who it's not for | Anyone needing 1-2 simple automations . use Zapier instead | Anyone needing one or two simple app connections |
| Privacy | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, and HIPAA-compliant with Microsoft 365 certification.³ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | No usable data in reviewed sources | No support evidence in reviewed sources |
| Public sentiment | Users consistently praise how easy Gumloop makes building AI workflows, while noting it can feel heavy and credit costs grow with usage.¹ | Users praise Make's visual builder and breadth of app connections, often adopting it after hitting Zapier's limits on complex workflows.11 |
| Biggest gotcha | Credit-based model: AI-heavy runs burn credits fast; model per-run costs first.⁵ | Real monthly cost requires 'real math'; usage spikes can outgrow your plan quickly |