Humanly
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you hire frontline or hourly workers at volume and need automated candidate screening.
New check
Comparison
Humanly and Pin both land on Depends.
Buy if you hire frontline or hourly workers at volume and need automated candidate screening.
Teams sourcing candidates at volume should start on the free tier; occasional hirers are overpaying for automation they won't use.
| Compare | Humanly | Pin |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | High-volume hourly hiring | High-volume candidate sourcers |
| Who it's not for | Small teams with occasional hires . overkill | Teams making a few hires a year . overkill |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁹ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.15 |
| Support quality | G2 users cite 'A++++' customer support | No support evidence found |
| Public sentiment | G2 reviews are strongly positive on screening and support, but SMB buyers on Reddit flag opaque pricing.³ | Independent user feedback is nearly absent; the only review source found is a truncated G2 snippet suggesting consistent praise.14 |
| Biggest gotcha | No public pricing; SMB Reddit thread calls it 'opaque' . expect a sales call⁴ | No public security page; ask for SOC 2 or data-handling docs before uploading candidate data15 |