JetBrains
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Professional developers on Java, Kotlin, or .NET get unmatched IDE depth and should buy.
New check
Comparison
JetBrains and Cursor both land on Depends.
Professional developers on Java, Kotlin, or .NET get unmatched IDE depth and should buy.
Buy if you are a professional developer or engineering team shipping code daily and can absorb usage-based costs.
| Compare | JetBrains | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | JVM/Kotlin teams | Professional developers shipping daily |
| Who it's not for | Hobbyists . free editors like VS Code do the job | Casual coders who will hit Pro limits and hate overages |
| Privacy | Multiple real CVEs, including a critical known-exploited TeamCity RCE and a 2026 incident with compromised AWS IAM users.⁶ | Active CVE stream 2025-2026 including remote code execution; patch fast and lock down agent permissions. |
| Support quality | No direct support evidence found | Refund fights and 1.6/5 Trustpilot |
| Public sentiment | Sentiment is split: long-time users praise the depth but complain about bloat, price hikes, and AI credit costs.¹ | Developers broadly praise Cursor's agent productivity and autocomplete, but many turned critical after 2025 pricing changes and quality dips.15 |
| Biggest gotcha | AI Pro uses credit consumption; users report costs ballooning with Junie⁵ | Usage pricing is opaque; power users report $200+/month vs the $20 plan |