Wiki.js
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Great fit if a technical person will own hosting, upgrades, and patching of a free, powerful wiki.
Comparison
Wiki.js and Docmost both land on Depends.
Great fit if a technical person will own hosting, upgrades, and patching of a free, powerful wiki.
Buy if you want a cheap, self-hosted Confluence/Notion replacement and have someone who can run a server.
| Compare | Wiki.js | Docmost |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Technical self-hosters | Regulated teams requiring self-hosting |
| Who it's not for | Non-technical teams wanting one-click setup | Non-technical teams with nobody to run a server |
| Privacy | Multiple public CVEs including recent authentication bypass (through 2.5.314) and privilege escalation . patch discipline is mandatory.⁷ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | Community support; paid help via hosts | No support evidence in sources reviewed |
| Public sentiment | Self-hosters praise its power and flexibility but repeatedly flag it as heavy to run and maintain.⁵ | Self-hosters on Reddit and forums pitch it as a lighter, cheaper Confluence/Notion alternative, but in-depth user reviews are still scarce. |
| Biggest gotcha | Running it well needs ongoing ops: upgrades, backups, CVE patching. Recent bypass CVEs hit older versions.⁷ | Community Edition has no SSO . a hard blocker for many companies; Enterprise pricing isn't public.16 |