Comparison

Make vs Zapier

Make and Zapier both land on Depends.
make.com
Buy if you run complex, multi-step automations and will actively track credit usage.
Read the full report
zapier.com
Buy if you need many cross-app automations or IT-governed AI agents; skip it for one or two simple connections.
Read the full report
Add this comparison to your site
Put the Make vs Zapier badge on your site.
Visitors see the independent comparison.
The link points here, and search engines follow it.
This is the badge visitors see on your site.
Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.
Make versus Zapier| Compare | Make | Zapier |
|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
|---|
| Best for | Ops teams with multi-step, branching automations | Ops teams automating across many SaaS apps |
|---|
| Who it's not for | Anyone needing one or two simple app connections | Teams needing one or two simple automations . use native integrations |
|---|
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
|---|
| Support quality | No support evidence in reviewed sources | Expert onboarding offered; no quality data |
|---|
| Public sentiment | Users praise Make's visual builder and breadth of app connections, often adopting it after hitting Zapier's limits on complex workflows. | Testimonials praise no-code speed and automation ROI, but no independent user review data surfaced. |
|---|
| Biggest gotcha | Real monthly cost requires 'real math'; usage spikes can outgrow your plan quickly | No pricing shown on reviewed pages; task-based pricing historically scales fast with volume. (Guess) |
|---|
Pick Make when
- Ops teams with multi-step, branching automations
- Teams outgrowing Zapier's complexity limits
- Agencies building client workflows
- Non-developers connecting many SaaS apps
When Make is not a fit
- Anyone needing one or two simple app connections
- Non-technical buyers wanting plug-and-play simplicity
- Teams that hate usage-based billing surprises
- Buyers unwilling to model credit burn before committing
Pick Zapier when
- Ops teams automating across many SaaS apps
- IT-governed AI agent rollouts
- Non-technical teams building no-code AI workflows
- Lead capture, enrichment, and CRM routing
When Zapier is not a fit
- Teams needing one or two simple automations . use native integrations
- Budget-sensitive small teams; task-based pricing compounds fast
- Developers wanting open-source, self-hosted automation control
- Buyers requiring independently verified security posture
Sources
review
review
review
review
news
news
news
news
official
security
security
official
news
official
official
official