mfgselect
Depends
Confidence: Low
Evidence is thin . mostly the site's own pages and LinkedIn posts by vendors and advisors . so confidence is low.
New check
Comparison
mfgselect and G2 both land on Depends.
Evidence is thin . mostly the site's own pages and LinkedIn posts by vendors and advisors . so confidence is low.
Buyers shortlisting B2B software should use G2 free as one input, cross-checked against Capterra or TrustRadius.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | SMB manufacturers shortlisting ERP/MRP/MES | B2B software buyers shortlisting tools |
| Who it's not for | Anyone not shopping manufacturing or distribution software . niche directory | Vendors without five-figure budgets |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.² | No public security page found; UpGuard reports no phishing; G2's own DPA references a past data breach.10 |
| Support quality | No evidence in sources. | Trustpilot and BBB complaints about G2's service |
| Public sentiment | No independent user reviews of mfgselect surfaced; all evidence is the site's own claims plus LinkedIn posts from vendors and advisors.¹ | Buyers find G2 useful for breadth, but sentiment on G2's own service skews negative on Trustpilot and Redditors weigh it against Capterra and Trustpilot.12 |
| Biggest gotcha | Paid sort placement means rankings aren't purely meritocratic; tune weights and verify shortlists yourself² | Vendor contracts are negotiated and opaque; budget five figures annually before committing.11 |