OpenCode
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy it if your team lives in the terminal and wants a free, model-agnostic agent with no vendor lock-in.
New check
Comparison
OpenCode and Cursor both land on Depends.
Buy it if your team lives in the terminal and wants a free, model-agnostic agent with no vendor lock-in.
Buy if you are a professional developer or engineering team shipping code daily and can absorb usage-based costs.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Terminal-comfortable developers | Professional developers shipping daily |
| Who it's not for | Non-technical founders wanting a polished vendor product | Casual coders who will hit Pro limits and hate overages |
| Privacy | One serious 2026 CVE (unauthenticated local server RCE); no public security page on the official site.⁴ | Active CVE stream 2025-2026 including remote code execution; patch fast and lock down agent permissions. |
| Support quality | No support evidence in sources. | Refund fights and 1.6/5 Trustpilot |
| Public sentiment | Social chatter is largely enthusiastic, with developers actively comparing it against Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex.¹ | Developers broadly praise Cursor's agent productivity and autocomplete, but many turned critical after 2025 pricing changes and quality dips.13 |
| Biggest gotcha | CVE-2026-22812 command injection: unauthenticated local server enables remote code execution. Patch fast.⁴ | Usage pricing is opaque; power users report $200+/month vs the $20 plan |