Orchard Core
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy it if you have .NET developers and want a free, modular, self-hosted CMS . it costs nothing but demands engineering time.
New check
Comparison
Orchard Core and Umbraco both land on Depends.
Buy it if you have .NET developers and want a free, modular, self-hosted CMS . it costs nothing but demands engineering time.
Buy it if you have .NET developers and need a flexible, multi-site or headless CMS . the open-source core is free and battle-tested.
| Compare | Orchard Core | Umbraco |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | .NET/C# developer teams | .NET developer teams |
| Who it's not for | Non-technical teams wanting a simple site | No-code marketers wanting a DIY site builder |
| Privacy | Public CVE history: multiple XSS issues since 2020; recent releases like 3.0.1 include security fixes.⁶ | Actively patched open-source CMS with several published CVEs in 2025-2026; fixes ship via advisories.15 |
| Support quality | Community and docs only; no vendor SLA | Paid support sold; Cloud complaints on Reddit |
| Public sentiment | Reddit .NET threads show a small, loyal developer community, with some questioning real-world adoption.⁵ | G2 users praise flexibility and long-term value, while Reddit opinion splits sharply on Umbraco Cloud hosting. |
| Biggest gotcha | ~20 CVEs listed; you need a patching and monitoring process⁷ | Reddit thread titled 'Umbraco Cloud - Avoid like the plague' targets the hosting, not the CMS12 |