shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Orchard Core?

Free, open-source .NET CMS & application framework - orchardcore.net

Depends. Buy it if you have .NET developers and want a free, modular, self-hosted CMS — it costs nothing but demands engineering time. Skip it if you need a simple website without developers; use WordPress or a hosted builder instead.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~40 public sources: official docs, GitHub, Reddit threads, and CVE databases. Review snippets were truncated, so user quotes were omitted.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Open-source

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • .NET/C# developer teams
  • Modular or headless CMS builds
  • Government and public-sector .NET sites
  • Zero-budget projects with dev capacity

Not for

  • Non-technical teams wanting a simple site
  • Marketers needing WYSIWYG editing without devs
  • Anyone without C#/.NET skills in-house
  • Teams needing vendor support SLAs

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

~20 CVEs listed; you need a patching and monitoring process

high

Self-hosting means you own security, backups, and upgrades

medium

Free license, but developer time is the real cost — budget for it

medium

Smaller community than WordPress: fewer themes, plugins, and hireable experts

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free and open-source .NET CMS and application framework
  • Modular architecture with REST APIs praised by developers
  • Listed as a headless CMS option on Jamstack
  • Active releases; 3.0.1 ships security fixes
  • Optional commerce module for building webshops

Cons

  • Framework, not a turnkey product — requires .NET development
  • Low visible adoption; developers ask if anyone actually uses it
  • Recurring XSS vulnerabilities across multiple versions
  • Self-hosted: you own hosting, updates, and patching
  • Community threads describe needing extra insight to get started

Sources & method

Analyzed 10/01/2026 - 8 sources - CVE history: multiple XSS issues since 2020; recent releases like 3.0.1 include security fixes.

official x4review x2security x2
  • CVE-2022-0274 — stored XSS in OrchardCore App CMS, Stored cross-site scripting vulnerability, publicly disclosed.
  • CVE-2022-0159 — medium severity, Disclosed as medium severity in OrchardCore.
  • CVE-2021-25966, Listed in the NIST NVD database for OrchardCore.
  • Persistent XSS in Orchard Core RC1 (2020), Public exploit published on Exploit-DB.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 8

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free and open-source; no license cost
  • Ease of use: 2/5. Guess: developer-first framework, not point-and-click
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Modular: headless, GraphQL, workflows, commerce module
  • Support quality: 2/5. Community and docs only; no vendor SLA
  • Security posture: 2/5. ~20 CVEs listed; recurring XSS issues
  • $0 Starting price Free, open-source
  • ~20 Known CVEs Listed for OrchardCore, mostly XSS
  • 3.0.1 Latest release Includes security fixes and a workaround

Pricing

Open-source

$0

  • Full CMS framework
  • Self-hosted
  • Community support

Security

CVE history: multiple XSS issues since 2020; recent releases like 3.0.1 include security fixes.

  • CVE-2022-0274 — stored XSS in OrchardCore App CMSStored cross-site scripting vulnerability, publicly disclosed.⁶
  • CVE-2022-0159 — medium severityDisclosed as medium severity in OrchardCore.
  • CVE-2021-25966Listed in the NIST NVD database for OrchardCore.
  • Persistent XSS in Orchard Core RC1 (2020)Public exploit published on Exploit-DB.

What users say

Reddit .NET threads show a small, loyal developer community, with some questioning real-world adoption.

Alternatives

Compare Orchard Core with each alternative.

  • Kentico Xperience

    Commercial .NET CMS with vendor support

Companies that use it

  • Government of Malta
Full analysis

Based on ~40 public sources: official docs, GitHub, Reddit threads, and CVE databases. Review snippets were truncated, so user quotes were omitted.

Free, powerful .NET CMS for dev teams; overkill and impractical if nobody on your team writes C#.

Methodology

Based on ~40 public sources: official docs, GitHub, Reddit threads, and CVE databases. Review snippets were truncated, so user quotes were omitted.

Sources

  1. Orchard Core — official siteorchardcore.net
    official
  2. OrchardCMS/OrchardCore on GitHubgithub.com
    official
  3. Orchard Core 3.0.1 release notesdocs.orchardcore.net
    official
  4. Does anyone use Orchard Core CMS? — Redditreddit.com
    review
  5. Shoutout to Orchard Core — Redditreddit.com
    review
  6. Orchard Core stored XSS — CVE-2022-0274miggo.io
    security
  7. OrchardCore vulnerabilities — GCVE databasedb.gcve.eu
    security
  8. Orchard Core — Jamstack headless CMS listingjamstack.org
    official

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.