Sorry™ (SorryApp)
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you run a SaaS or IT product that needs a polished public or private status page and can stomach $99/month.
New check
Comparison
Sorry™ (SorryApp) vs Hyperping
Sorry™ (SorryApp) lands on Depends, and Hyperping lands on Worth it.
Hyperping
Worth it
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you're a small-to-mid team wanting uptime monitoring, status pages, and on-call at flat, predictable pricing.
| Compare | Sorry™ (SorryApp) | Hyperping |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Worth it |
| Best for | SaaS teams needing public incident pages | SaaS teams wanting uptime + status page in one |
| Who it's not for | Hobby or solo projects . a hosted status page is overkill | Enterprises needing full observability . logs, APM, traces |
| Privacy | Publishes a security page, vulnerability disclosure policy, and automated scans; one legacy-plugin vulnerability was patched in Feb 2025.⁴ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | No usable evidence either way | No direct support evidence found |
| Public sentiment | Users say it does the job well, but independent public reviews are sparse.⁷ | Users praise the ease of use, design, and generous free plan, though one competitor page cites false-alert complaints.14 |
| Biggest gotcha | $99/month to start, no free tier, 7-day trial only . expensive for one status page¹ | Phare positions itself against Hyperping's feature gating; expect some features locked to higher tiers |
Pick Sorry™ (SorryApp) when
- SaaS teams needing public incident pages
- IT teams running internal status pages
- API-driven incident workflows
- Buyers seeking a Statuspage alternative
When Sorry™ (SorryApp) is not a fit
- Hobby or solo projects . a hosted status page is overkill
- Budget-tight startups . $99/mo entry with no free tier
- Teams wanting monitoring bundled . Sorry is comms, not monitoring
- Anyone needing abundant third-party reviews to decide . there are few
Pick Hyperping when
- SaaS teams wanting uptime + status page in one
- Solo devs and small startups (free 20 monitors)
- EU/GDPR-conscious companies wanting EU data hosting
- Teams replacing PagerDuty's per-user on-call pricing
When Hyperping is not a fit
- Enterprises needing full observability . logs, APM, traces
- Teams wanting monitoring-as-code workflows
- Guess: self-hosters . Uptime Kuma covers that, Hyperping is SaaS-only
- Buyers maximizing monitors-per-dollar at scale . competitors undercut it
Sources
- Status Page Pricing | Sorry™sorryapp.comofficial
- Enterprise Security & Compliance | Sorry™sorryapp.comsecurity
- Vulnerability Disclosure Policy | Sorry™sorryapp.comsecurity
- Security patch for the legacy website pluginstatus.sorryapp.comsecurity
official
- Status Page API for Automated Workflows | Sorry™sorryapp.comofficial
review
review
- Blind vs. Sorry Comparison . SourceForgesourceforge.netreview
- Robert Rawlins, Co-Founder & CTO . LinkedInuk.linkedin.comofficial
- Fortra uses Sorry™ . LinkedInlinkedin.comnews
official
- Hyperping Pricing (2026): $24-249 Tiersfoursight.cloudreview
- Hyperping Reviews . G2g2.comreview
- Hyperping on Product Huntproducthunt.comreview
- Hyperping Revenue 2023: $131K ARRgetlatka.comnews