shouldiuse.io

New check

Comparison

Tandfonline (Taylor & Francis Online) vs Doaj

Tandfonline (Taylor & Francis Online) lands on Depends, and Doaj lands on Worth it.

Doaj

doaj.org

Worth it
Confidence: Medium

Free, community-funded index that is the de facto whitelist for legitimate open-access journals . researchers, librarians and funders should use it.

Read the full report

Tandfonline (Taylor & Francis Online) versus Doaj
CompareTandfonline (Taylor & Francis Online)Doaj
VerdictDependsWorth it
Best forUniversity librariesResearchers vetting open-access journals
Who it's not forIndividuals without library access . per-article paywalls stingBuyers wanting a purchasable SaaS tool with support SLAs
PrivacyNo known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.²No public vulnerabilities found for DOAJ itself; a 2025 XSS CVE affects a third-party WordPress export plugin, not.
Support qualityReview snippets too truncated to judgeNo support quality evidence in sources
Public sentimentMixed: a trusted, established publisher, but Reddit and Trustpilot users report paywall frustration, access problems, and slow editorial progress.⁶Researchers and librarians treat DOAJ as the free go-to whitelist for legitimate open-access journals, while some debate whether it carries the same weight as Scopus.
Biggest gotchaAccess often runs through library authentication . no institutional access means per-article payments12Fake journals claim DOAJ indexing; always verify on itself, not the journal's site15

Pick Tandfonline (Taylor & Francis Online) when

  • University libraries
  • Researchers with institutional access
  • Authors targeting a specific T&F journal
  • Consortia with Read-and-Publish deals

When Tandfonline (Taylor & Francis Online) is not a fit

  • Individuals without library access . per-article paywalls sting
  • Authors needing fast decisions . reviews reportedly stall for weeks
  • Budget-conscious small institutions . pricing is quote-only, not public
  • Anyone treating this as software . it is a journal platform, not a team tool

Pick Doaj when

  • Researchers vetting open-access journals
  • Librarians curating trusted OA collections
  • Funders checking OA compliance
  • OA publishers building credibility

When Doaj is not a fit

  • Buyers wanting a purchasable SaaS tool with support SLAs
  • Authors needing impact factors or citation metrics
  • Committees requiring Scopus/Web of Science prestige
  • Journals wanting quick, guaranteed indexing

Sources

  1. Taylor & Francis Online homepagetandfonline.com
    official
  2. CyStack security report: 92.6/100cystack.net
    security
  3. HTTP Security Headers . tandfonline.combeavercheck.com
    security
  4. First time publishing - T&F, still 'With Editor' after 5 weeksreddit.com
    review
  5. I thought Taylor and Francis was a reputable journal?reddit.com
    review
  6. Taylor & Francis Online reviews on Trustpilottrustpilot.com
    review
  7. Pricing Information - Helphelp.tandfonline.com
    official
  8. Taylor & Francis . Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
    official
  9. Taylor & Francis Open Accesstandfonline.com
    official
  10. Help with full access / downloadsreddit.com
    review
  11. Jisc Read and Publish 2026-28 agreementsubscriptionsmanager.jisc.ac.uk
    official
  12. OCLC EZproxy stanza for Taylor & Francis Onlinehelp.oclc.org
    official
  13. DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journalsdoaj.org
    official
  14. DOAJ Application Guide for OJS Journals - PKP Docsdocs.pkp.sfu.ca
    official
  15. Some journals say they are indexed in DOAJ but they are notblog.doaj.org
    official
  16. DOAJ supporter modelsdoaj.org
    official