wxWidgets
Depends
Confidence: Medium
A solid free choice if you are building a cross-platform C++ desktop app and can live without vendor support.
New check
Comparison
wxWidgets and Electron both land on Depends.
A solid free choice if you are building a cross-platform C++ desktop app and can live without vendor support.
Adopt it if your team already builds web apps and needs one codebase for Windows, macOS, and Linux.
| Compare | wxWidgets | Electron |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | C++ desktop apps | Web teams shipping desktop apps |
| Who it's not for | Web or mobile apps | Lightweight utility apps . too heavy |
| Privacy | Mature project with a product security page; Red Hat, SUSE, and Mageia track and patch periodic CVEs.13 | Mature but CVE-prone: multiple recent vulnerabilities demand prompt upgrades and careful configuration. |
| Support quality | Community forums only, no vendor | Community support only, no vendor SLA |
| Public sentiment | Community sees wxWidgets as a dependable native-widget toolkit that lags Qt in tooling and mindshare.⁸ | Developers love shipping one web codebase everywhere but widely complain about memory bloat, security churn, and app sluggishness. |
| Biggest gotcha | No vendor SLA; official help is community forums. Commercial support exists only via third-party consultancies.⁵ | You own security patching: CVEs like runAsNode required urgent app-level fixes |