shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Big News Network.com?

Global news aggregation and press release syndication network - bignewsnetwork.com

Depends. Workable as a cheap, wide-syndication newswire for SEO visibility and quick pickup. Not a fit if you need credible journalist reach, brand-safe placement, or transparent pricing and audience data.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~11 public sources; no published pricing or substantive user reviews found.

Ratings

  • Value for moneyNo public pricing evidence
  • Ease of useNo user experience evidence
  • Feature depthOnly submission and syndication evidenced
  • Support qualityNo support reviews found
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Affiliate and SEO content syndication
  • Cheap newswire-style pickup
  • Small PR budgets wanting a wide net

Not for

  • Brands needing credible journalist pickup
  • Anyone expecting Google to value syndicated links
  • Regulated firms needing brand-safe placements
  • Buyers wanting published pricing and reach metrics

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Prices set through guest-post marketplaces, not a public rate card; expect haggling

high

Your release can run next to casino and affiliate content; brand-safety risk

medium

Same story replicates across sister sites; duplicate content risks diluting SEO value

medium

No published reach guarantees or audience data; verify traffic independently before paying

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Syndicates stories across sister sites like the Irish Sun
  • Listed as a news source in LexisNexis Risk Solutions
  • Accepts news release submissions directly
  • Has a Muck Rack profile for journalist discovery
  • Included in Feedspot news RSS feed directories

Cons

  • Publishes casino, IPTV, and review-buying promotional content alongside news
  • Sold as guest-post placements via marketplaces; pay-to-play publishing
  • No public traffic or audience metrics surfaced in sources reviewed
  • Minimal substantive independent user reviews found

Sources & method

Analyzed 10/03/2026 - 11 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x3review x4security x2news x2

Key stats

  • Security posture: 3/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 11

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money. No public pricing evidence
  • Ease of use. No user experience evidence
  • Feature depth. Only submission and syndication evidenced
  • Support quality. No support reviews found
  • Security posture: 3/5. Publishes security page; no public findings
  • B Guest-post marketplace grade guestpost.uk marketplace listing
  • Yes LexisNexis listing Named news source in Risk Solutions
  • Muck Rack Journalist directory profile Listed as a media outlet

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Independent user reviews are scarce; third-party listings describe a large aggregation network that also sells guest-post placements.

Companies that use it

  • Crexendo
  • Accurate Background
  • HUB Cyber Security
  • TEGNA
Full analysis

Based on ~11 public sources; no published pricing or substantive user reviews found.

Pay-to-play news aggregator: fine for cheap syndication noise, weak for real PR credibility or brand safety.

Methodology

Based on ~11 public sources; no published pricing or substantive user reviews found.

Sources

  1. official
  2. review
  3. official
  4. official
  5. news
  6. news
  7. review
  8. review
  9. Product security pagebignewsnetwork.com
    security
  10. security
  11. review

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.