shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Foodgawker?

Not disclosed - foodgawker.com

Depends. A free, curated food-photo gallery — worth submitting to if you're a food blogger with strong photography chasing referral traffic. Skip it if you want actual recipes or a reliably maintained site; it went down in 2023 and users call it weak on recipes.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~20 public sources; no pricing tiers or security incidents found. Quote snippets are partially truncated in source data.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo rating evidence found
  • Security postureSecurity page exists; no incident evidence

Pricing

$0

Free

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Food bloggers seeking referral traffic
  • Visual recipe browsing
  • Home cooks wanting plating inspiration

Not for

  • Home cooks who want full recipes, not photos
  • Bloggers with amateur photography — expect rejection
  • Anyone needing reliable uptime — site went down in 2023
  • Teams shopping for software; it's a media site, not a tool

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Site suffered an unexplained outage in 2023; maintenance commitment unclear

medium

Rejections hinge on photo quality; acceptance criteria feel opaque and subjective

medium

Accepted posts link out to your blog; click-through traffic is not guaranteed

medium

Submission requires specific photo dimensions and styling; effort may be wasted

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free to browse and submit photos
  • Curated photo gallery gives a polished visual experience
  • Established traffic channel food bloggers use for exposure
  • Publishes security and privacy pages

Cons

  • Strict photo curation; submissions frequently rejected
  • Users say it is not great for actual recipes
  • Reliability concerns — site went down in 2023
  • No public customer review ratings found

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/30/2026 - 9 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x3review x3security x1news x2

Key stats

  • Value for money: 4/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 9

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 4/5. Free for users and submitters
  • Ease of use: 3/5. Easy browsing; strict photo submission rules
  • Feature depth: 2/5. Photo gallery first; weak recipe functionality
  • Support quality. No rating evidence found
  • Security posture. Security page exists; no incident evidence
  • $0 Price Free to browse and submit
  • Yes Free tier Free web and iOS app
  • $336.5K/yr Estimated revenue Crunchbase estimate

Pricing

Free

$0

  • Unlimited recipe photo browsing
  • Photo submission with editorial review

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Food bloggers value it as a curated photo exposure channel, while home cooks find it lacking for actual recipe use.

“foodgawker: Food porn Bible & recipe aggregator”
Product Hunt listing
“I'm not sure whether to feel upset that Foodgawker has rejected”
Facebook, Plantified group
Full analysis

Based on ~20 public sources; no pricing tiers or security incidents found. Quote snippets are partially truncated in source data.

Free curated food-photo site. Good for blogger exposure if photos are pro-grade; weak for finding real recipes.

Methodology

Based on ~20 public sources; no pricing tiers or security incidents found. Quote snippets are partially truncated in source data.

Sources

  1. Foodgawker About Usfoodgawker.com
    official
  2. Is Foodgawker Down – What Happened?seasonalcookbook.com
    news
  3. What's your go to recipe site? — Reddit r/Cookingreddit.com
    review
  4. How to Submit Photos to Foodgawkerphotographylife.com
    official
  5. How to get your recipes accepted by FoodGawkerohmydish.com
    review
  6. Foodgawker — Crunchbase Company Profilecrunchbase.com
    news
  7. Foodgawker security pagefoodgawker.com
    security
  8. Foodgawker iOS app listingfoodgawker-ios.soft112.com
    official
  9. Foodgawker rejection discussion — Facebook groupfacebook.com
    review

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.