shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Paragon (useparagon — embedded integration platform)?

Explore our homepage to discover our unparalleled expertise and innovative solutions in the construction industry. Contact us today! (Note: tagline does not match the integration product most sources describe) - paragon.io

Depends. Buy if your SaaS or AI product needs customer-facing integrations and you have engineers to own an embedded iPaaS. Skip it if you're non-technical, want published pricing, or were actually looking for one of the many other 'Paragon' companies — including the construction firm your tagline describes.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~10 public sources usable for this product. Heads-up: most 'Paragon' search results are unrelated companies (backup software, spyware, fitness wear, security firms); the pasted tagline says construction, which does not match the integration platform the credible review evidence describes.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo evidence in sources
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • B2B SaaS teams shipping customer-facing integrations
  • AI products needing RAG + agent connectors
  • Engineering-led product teams

Not for

  • Non-technical teams wanting no-code automations
  • Anyone needing only 1–2 simple integrations — build them in-house
  • Teams demanding published pricing before a sales call
  • Construction buyers — pasted tagline describes a different Paragon

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

No public pricing — usage-based, sales-quoted; expect bill surprises as integration volume grows

low

Vendor security docs hedge ('no enterprise…') — audit their security page before routing customer data

Pros and cons

Pros

  • 4.6/5 rating across 90 G2 reviews
  • G2 users 'consistently praise' the product
  • VC-backed, with an announced Series A
  • Positioned for AI-era work: RAG ingestion to agent actions

Cons

  • 'Paragon is a technical tool' — requires engineering resources
  • No public pricing; you must talk to sales
  • Competitors publish dedicated analyses calling pricing a shortfall
  • Thin independent feedback; only 90 G2 reviews

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/21/2026 - 10 sources - No vulnerabilities found for Paragon (useparagon) in sources reviewed; CVE-2025-0286/0287/0289 findings belong to unrelated Paragon Software backup products, and CVE-2025-52987 to Juniper's Paragon Automation.

official x3review x2security x1news x4

Key stats

  • Value for money: 2/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 10

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 2/5. No public pricing; rivals flag shortfalls
  • Ease of use: 2/5. Described as 'a technical tool'
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Broad: RAG ingestion to agent actions
  • Support quality. No evidence in sources
  • Security posture: 3/5. Security docs published; no product CVEs found
  • 4.6/5 G2 rating 90 reviews on G2 seller page
  • Not published Starting price Sales-quoted; competitors call it opaque
  • Unclear Free tier G2 listing shows a free marker; vendor doesn't confirm
  • Series A Funding Announced on company blog

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

No vulnerabilities found for Paragon (useparagon) in sources reviewed; CVE-2025-0286/0287/0289 findings belong to unrelated Paragon Software backup products, and CVE-2025-52987 to Juniper's Paragon Automation.

What users say

G2 shows a 4.6/5 rating across 90 reviews with users 'consistently praising' it, but detailed independent feedback is scarce and 'Paragon' searches are polluted by unrelated companies.

Alternatives

Compare Paragon (useparagon — embedded integration platform) with each alternative.

Full analysis

Based on ~10 public sources usable for this product. Heads-up: most 'Paragon' search results are unrelated companies (backup software, spyware, fitness wear, security firms); the pasted tagline says construction, which does not match the integration platform the credible review evidence describes.

Well-rated (4.6/5 G2) embedded iPaaS for engineers building customer integrations; opaque pricing, technical, name-collides everywhere.

Methodology

Based on ~10 public sources usable for this product. Heads-up: most 'Paragon' search results are unrelated companies (backup software, spyware, fitness wear, security firms); the pasted tagline says construction, which does not match the integration platform the credible review evidence describes.

Sources

  1. Paragon Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Featuresg2.com
    review
  2. Paragon Products | Read 90 Reviews on G2g2.com
    review
  3. Paragon — Integration platform for AI agents and productsuseparagon.com
    official
  4. Pricing | Paragon Integration Infrastructureuseparagon.com
    official
  5. Series A Announcementuseparagon.com
    official
  6. Paragon's pricing: What You Should Know Before Signing Upnango.dev
    news
  7. Paragon pricing: why it falls short of your integration needsmerge.dev
    news
  8. Cyclr vs. Paragon | Choosing an Embedded iPaaScyclr.com
    news
  9. Paragon Alternatives: A Decision Framework for B2B SaaS Teamsviasocket.com
    news
  10. Security - Paragon Documentationdocs.useparagon.com
    security

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.