shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Skyscanner(スカイスキャナー)?

Find the cheapest flights fast - skyscanner.net

Worth it. Use Skyscanner if you hunt cheap flights and want to compare airlines and agencies side by side at no cost. Skip it if you want one-stop booking with someone to call when things break — it only redirects you to third parties.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 14 public sources, mostly Japanese travel blogs plus Skyscanner's own security page.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Budget flight hunters
  • Flexible dates or open destinations
  • LCC and international fare comparison
  • Price-checking hotels and rental cars

Not for

  • Anyone wanting to book, pay, and get support in one place
  • Travelers unwilling to vet sketchy budget OTAs
  • People loyal to one airline or alliance
  • Corporate travel buyers needing invoices or policy controls

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Cheapest listings are often small overseas OTAs; if the booking breaks, recourse is limited

medium

Price shown can differ once you reach the agency's site; recheck before paying

medium

You never transact with Skyscanner; refunds and changes are the airline's or agency's problem

low

Many blog recommendations carry affiliate tracking links (associateid/utm); cross-check fares yourself

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Compares about 1,200 airline and agency sites in real time
  • Includes overseas agencies Japanese comparison sites miss
  • Search without a set destination, or across whole months
  • Reviewers say it reliably surfaces cheaper fares
  • Hotel bookings via Skyscanner beat Expedia or direct prices

Cons

  • Cheapest results often come from risky overseas agencies
  • Fares can change after you click through to the booking site
  • Doesn't sell tickets itself; you book with third parties

Sources & method

Analyzed 10/05/2026 - 10 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x1review x8security x1

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 10

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free, and reviewers find cheaper fares
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Reviewers call the search simple
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Flights, hotels, cars; month and everywhere search
  • Support quality: 2/5. No booking support; third-party OTA risk
  • Security posture: 4/5. Dedicated security team and disclosure policy
  • Free Cost to search Metasearch; you book with the airline or agency
  • ~1,200 Sites compared Airlines and travel agencies, in real time
  • Yes Flexible search Undecided destinations and month-wide date search

Pricing

Free tier: Yes

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Japanese travel bloggers and Q&A users praise cheap-fare discovery and flexible search but warn the cheapest OTA listings are risky.

“通常でも安いエクスペディアやHotels.comなのに、スカイスキャナー経由から予約すると更に安くなるのはハッピー!”
Travel blog, Triptriptrip (note.com)
“最安値で表示される海外の旅行会社は危険”
Travel blog, Tabihate
“年末年始の海外旅行スカイスキャナーと航空会社からの直接購入、どちらが安いでしょうか?”
Yahoo! Chiebukuro Q&A

Alternatives

Compare Skyscanner(スカイスキャナー) with each alternative.

Full analysis

Based on 14 public sources, mostly Japanese travel blogs plus Skyscanner's own security page.

Free fare metasearch across ~1,200 sites — great for price hunting, but you book (and fight) with third-party OTAs, not Skyscanner.

Methodology

Based on 14 public sources, mostly Japanese travel blogs plus Skyscanner's own security page.

Sources

  1. security
  2. official
  3. review
  4. review
  5. review
  6. review
  7. review
  8. review
  9. review
  10. review

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.